2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2019.104343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive step-size fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm and sparse-spike deconvolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When terahertz waves propagate in different media, their transmission and reflection occur due to a change in the refractive index at the media interface [ 16 ]. The transmission of terahertz waves in a ceramic–glue structure is shown in Figure 1 .…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When terahertz waves propagate in different media, their transmission and reflection occur due to a change in the refractive index at the media interface [ 16 ]. The transmission of terahertz waves in a ceramic–glue structure is shown in Figure 1 .…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thorough theoretical analysis in [ 16 ] proves the convergence of this iterative shrinkage algorithm, guaranteeing that the solution is the global minimizer for convex f . Obviously, the time resolution of the obtained impulse response function f by sparse deconvolution depends upon the time resolution of the reference signal h , which is itself determined by the discretization precision corresponding to the data sampling period T s .…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then SSD [13][14][15] which is widely used in earthquake impact detection can be used here for fault extraction. Shulin Pan [16][17][18] has contributed a lot to the field of SSD and made a great progress on it in these years. His research proves that this algorithm is sensitive to impact based on sparsity assumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the most commonly used devices for the high-resolution imaging of biological or biomedical targets include confocal microscopes [1], stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopes [2], and structured light illumination microscopes (SIM) [3] etc. Furthermore, many algorithms have been developed to improve the spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of biological images, including degenerate-model-based algorithms (e.g., deconvolution [4][5][6][7][8]), mathematical transformation-based algorithms (e.g., spectrum analysis [9,10], DWT analysis [11][12][13][14][15][16]), and machine-learning-based algorithms (e.g., deep learning [17][18][19]). However, most of these algorithms focus on a single task, e.g., inhibiting noise, identifying structure contours, or improving resolution.…”
Section: Introduction 1research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%