2016 23rd International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ict.2016.7500453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Split Bregman for sparse and low rank massive MIMO channel estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This scheme is studied in different literature works, e.g. [6], [7], where different CS recovery algorithms are proposed as structured subspace pursuit in [6], and split Bregman in [7]. These CS algorithms are proposed to recover single measurement vector (SMV) channels, so they are called SMV CS algorithms.…”
Section: A Existing Research Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scheme is studied in different literature works, e.g. [6], [7], where different CS recovery algorithms are proposed as structured subspace pursuit in [6], and split Bregman in [7]. These CS algorithms are proposed to recover single measurement vector (SMV) channels, so they are called SMV CS algorithms.…”
Section: A Existing Research Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Split Bregman method (SBM) proposed in [28] is a universal convex optimization algorithm for both l 1 -norm and TV-norm regularization problems. By the idea of decomposing the original problem into several subproblems worked out by Bregman Iteration (BI) [29,30], SBM has been widely utilized in the complex domain through the complex-to-real converting technique [31,32], e.g., MRI imaging [33], SAR imaging [34], forward-looking scanning radar imaging [35], SAR image super-resolution [36], and massive MIMO channel estimation [37]. However, SBM still has great potential in terms of both reconstruction performance and time cost considering the following two points: The original BI defined in the real domain may not make good use of the phase information for complex variables, which degrades the recovery accuracy; secondly, the converting technique quadruples the elements of the sensing matrix A to 2 m × 2 n , which consumes more memory and time within the iteration process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%