2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2008.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive servo-ventilation in patients with coexisting obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea and Cheyne–Stokes respiration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the algorithm for flowtriggered ASV allows the application of CPAP (minimal IPAPϭEPAP) and enables one to define the back-up rate individually, whereas the volume-triggered ASV device applies a minimal difference of 3 cm ⅐ H 2 O between minimal IPAP and EPAP and has only an automatic back-up rate. Therefore, flow-triggered ASV is considered to be more practical for normalizing breathing in patients with coexisting OSA and CSR-CSA than volume-triggered ASV, which has been developed with a focus on patients with predominant CSR-CSA, 16,17 even though no studies have compared these 2 devices. Because patients with pure CSR-CSA are rare in the current clinical setting, it might be important to focus on patients with coexisting OSA and CSR-CSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, the algorithm for flowtriggered ASV allows the application of CPAP (minimal IPAPϭEPAP) and enables one to define the back-up rate individually, whereas the volume-triggered ASV device applies a minimal difference of 3 cm ⅐ H 2 O between minimal IPAP and EPAP and has only an automatic back-up rate. Therefore, flow-triggered ASV is considered to be more practical for normalizing breathing in patients with coexisting OSA and CSR-CSA than volume-triggered ASV, which has been developed with a focus on patients with predominant CSR-CSA, 16,17 even though no studies have compared these 2 devices. Because patients with pure CSR-CSA are rare in the current clinical setting, it might be important to focus on patients with coexisting OSA and CSR-CSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Indeed, several groups have reported the efficacy of ASV for suppressing SDB using 2 different types of ASV: volumetriggered ASV, and the newer, flow-triggered ASV, which has been developed based on the concept of normalizing breathing in patients with both OSA and CSR-CSA. [15][16][17] Although several reports have demonstrated the efficacy of volume-triggered ASV for improving device compliance and cardiac function in patients with predominant CSR-CSA, 18 -20 there are no similar data showing such efficacies using flow-triggered ASV. Moreover, no data about the efficacy of ASV for patients with CHF with coexisting OSA and CSR-CSA are available.…”
Section: Clinical Perspective On P 148mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AHI could be normalised with ASV (,5 events?h -1 ) in the majority of CompSAS patients. RANDERATH et al [45] evaluated the effect of ASV in patients with obstructive as well as central apnoeas. The total AHI decreased from 46.8 to 7.8, the central AHI from 25.7 to 7.1 and the obstructive AHI from 14.2 to 0.7.…”
Section: Bipap In the Spontaneous-timed Mode And Adaptive Servoventilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When breathing resumes and ventilation exceeds the target, pressure support is reduced to the minimum of 3 cm H 2 O. Adaptive servo ventilation has been used primarily in the treatment of patients with sleep-disordered breathing associated with chronic congestive heart failure and Cheyne-Stokes respirations or periodic breathing. [62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73] Whether it might also have application during NIV in patients with acute respiratory failure has not been studied, to my knowledge.…”
Section: Mode Asynchronymentioning
confidence: 99%