1994
DOI: 10.1177/014920639402000105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Self-regulation: A Process View of Managerial Effectiveness

Abstract: This article describes a set of processes involved in

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
160
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
10
160
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, achieving the reduced perceptual discrepancies is not an end in itself; just as important is the positive impact it can have on personal and employee outcomes (Hollenbeck, 1989;Phillips, Hollenbeck, & Ilgen, 1996). Thus, managerial behaviors and actions improved through the self-awareness coaching intervention should not only be recognized by others (discrepancy reduction), but should also result in improved attitudes of the target managers themselves-since they became aware of the facts, learned how to evaluate them, and developed effective behavioral responses-and better attitudes of their employees -since, due to the change in managerial behaviors and actions, they operate under more effective managers and thus have a favorable attitudinal reaction (Atwater, Waldman, Atwater, & Cartier, 2000;Atwater et al, 2002;Tsui & Ashford, 1994).…”
Section: Background Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, achieving the reduced perceptual discrepancies is not an end in itself; just as important is the positive impact it can have on personal and employee outcomes (Hollenbeck, 1989;Phillips, Hollenbeck, & Ilgen, 1996). Thus, managerial behaviors and actions improved through the self-awareness coaching intervention should not only be recognized by others (discrepancy reduction), but should also result in improved attitudes of the target managers themselves-since they became aware of the facts, learned how to evaluate them, and developed effective behavioral responses-and better attitudes of their employees -since, due to the change in managerial behaviors and actions, they operate under more effective managers and thus have a favorable attitudinal reaction (Atwater, Waldman, Atwater, & Cartier, 2000;Atwater et al, 2002;Tsui & Ashford, 1994).…”
Section: Background Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals with lower self-esteem tend to take feedback situations too personally, ruminate about self-worth and show weakened ability to deal with both positive and negative feedback than individuals with higher self-esteem (Brown, 2010;Krenn et al, 2013). Feedback-seekers with low self-esteem usually tend to avoid negative feedback and prefer utilization of indirect feedback-seeking methods (Tsul & Ashford, 1994).…”
Section: Psychological Factors Of the Feedback-related Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feedback of a negative type can be useful and point out which measures need to be taken to get competencies back on track (cf. Tsui and Ashford 1994). It is therefore likely that ISAs who are learning-oriented will interpret negative feedback from their suppliers more diagnostically than destructively.…”
Section: Feedback and Goal Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the scenario where for example particular setbacks may have occurred due to a lack of skill, some people are motivated to work harder to achieve an outcome (cf. Tsui and Ashford 1994). Learning orientation therefore provides a motive to work longer hours primarily due to the intrinsic reward gained from enjoying work and is therefore expected to positively relate to overall time and effort expended on the job (Dweck and Leggett 1988;VandeWalle et al 1999).…”
Section: Goal Orientations and Work Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%