1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-49197-2_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Segmentation of MRI Data

Abstract: Intensity-based classification of MR images has proven problematic, even when advanced techniques are used. Intra-scan and interscan intensity inhomogeneities are a common source of difficulty. While reported methods have had some success in correcting intra-scan inhomogeneities, such methods require supervision for the individual scan. This paper describes a new method called adaptive segmentation that uses knowledge of tissue intensity properties and intensity inhomogeneities to correct and segment MR images… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
344
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(345 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
344
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intensity-based methods assign tissue classes to image voxels (Wells III et al, 1995;Alsabti et al, 1998;Van Leemput et al, 1999a,b) with high accuracy, but they can not identify the individual organs and anatomical regions within each tissue class. Methods based on elastic and fluid registration can identify anatomical structures in the brain by deforming a labeled probabilistic brain atlas onto the subject brain (Joshi and Miller, 2000;Avants et al, 2005;Davatzikos et al, 2001;Thirion, 1996).…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intensity-based methods assign tissue classes to image voxels (Wells III et al, 1995;Alsabti et al, 1998;Van Leemput et al, 1999a,b) with high accuracy, but they can not identify the individual organs and anatomical regions within each tissue class. Methods based on elastic and fluid registration can identify anatomical structures in the brain by deforming a labeled probabilistic brain atlas onto the subject brain (Joshi and Miller, 2000;Avants et al, 2005;Davatzikos et al, 2001;Thirion, 1996).…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps most importantly, MR images are known to contain low frequency spatial intensity variations often called RF inhomogeneity or shading artifact. The correction for this artifact can be assumed to be performed before PV estimation and there exist several methods for the task (e.g., Sled et al, 1998;Wells et al, 1996). Another somewhat controversial issue of the model is the assumed Gaussian distributions for tissue classes and for the noise component.…”
Section: Statistical Model For the Partial Volume Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automated segmentation has been an elusive goal in the processing of medical images, leaving expert anatomical knowledge as the sole basis for the manual segmentation or definition of brain ROIs. The manual definition of ROIs, however, is problematic because different experts usually produce different segmentations of the same image (5), and even the same expert will produce differing segmentations when segmenting the same image twice (6). The reliability and validity of segmentation can suffer even when subdividing highly discrete anatomical structures, such as the CC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%