2021
DOI: 10.1002/acs.3243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive saturation compensation for strict‐feedback systems with unknown control coefficient and input saturation

Abstract: Summary This work presents an adaptive saturation compensation scheme for the strict‐feedback uncertain systems with unknown control coefficient and input saturation. An adaptive saturation dynamic filter that does not require the a priori information of the completely unknown control coefficient is incorporated to correct position errors online to reduce the saturation effect. A Nussbaum‐type function is employed to handle the unknown control coefficient and avoid the control singularity. The adaptive command… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where 𝜉 1 and 𝜉 2 denote the state vectors produced by the auxiliary dynamic filter. 33 K 1 = K T 1 and K 2 = K T 2 represent the 3 × 3 positive-definite design matrices and Δ𝜏 = 𝜏 − 𝜏 c represents the control derivation vector induced by actuator saturation (15). The signals 𝜉 1 and 𝜉 2 are the filtered versions of the saturation effects on the variables being controlled.…”
Section: Anti-disturbance Control Design Under Actuator Saturationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where 𝜉 1 and 𝜉 2 denote the state vectors produced by the auxiliary dynamic filter. 33 K 1 = K T 1 and K 2 = K T 2 represent the 3 × 3 positive-definite design matrices and Δ𝜏 = 𝜏 − 𝜏 c represents the control derivation vector induced by actuator saturation (15). The signals 𝜉 1 and 𝜉 2 are the filtered versions of the saturation effects on the variables being controlled.…”
Section: Anti-disturbance Control Design Under Actuator Saturationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the actuator saturation effects, the following auxiliary filer is constructed by alignleftrightalign-odddξ1align-even=K1ξ1dt+J(ψ)ξ2dt$$ \kern0.3em d{\xi}_1\kern0.5em =-{K}_1{\xi}_1 dt+J\left(\psi \right){\xi}_2 dt $$ alignleftrightalign-odddξ2align-even=M1K2ξ2dt+M1Δτdt$$ d{\xi}_2\kern0.5em =-{M}^{-1}{K}_2{\xi}_2 dt+{M}^{-1}\Delta \tau dt $$ where ξ1$$ {\xi}_1 $$ and ξ2$$ {\xi}_2 $$ denote the state vectors produced by the auxiliary dynamic filter 33 . K1=K1normalT$$ {K}_1={K}_1^{\mathrm{T}} $$ and K2=K2normalT$$ {K}_2={K}_2^{\mathrm{T}} $$ represent the 3prefix×3$$ 3\times 3 $$ positive‐definite design matrices and normalΔτ=τprefix−τc$$ \Delta \tau =\tau -{\tau}_c $$ represents the control derivation vector induced by actuator saturation (15).…”
Section: Event‐triggered Disturbance Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the problem formulation of model-based adaptive control is meaningful for resilient control. In general, if system (2) has the lower-triangular form, or strict-feedback form, then backstepping designs originating from [51], [52] are very fruitful not only for the case of ordinary differential equations [53], but also for other classes such as stochastic systems [54], etc.…”
Section: A Model-based Adaptive Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the help of the auxiliary dynamic signal, approximation-based adaptive control was proposed for uncertain nonaffine plants in Zhang and Gao [17]. An auxiliary system was constructed to compensate the effect of the input saturation in Olofsson and Nielsen [18]; the same tactics were presented in earlier studies [19,20]. Besides, the Gaussion error function was employed to handle with estimating the model along with an error bound in Si and Dong [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%