2020
DOI: 10.1017/s0263574720000508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Robust Tracker Design for Nonlinear Sandwich Systems Subject to Saturation Nonlinearities

Abstract: SUMMARY This paper addresses the tracking problem for uncertain nonlinear sandwich systems that consist of two nonlinear subsystems and saturation nonlinearity, which is sandwiched between the subsystems. The considered sandwich system is also subject to a nonsymmetric input saturation constraint. Due to the nonsmooth characteristics of sandwiched saturation nonlinearity and also the input saturation function, the design procedure deals with hard challenges. To overcome these difficulties, a recursive appro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tracking problem of sandwich systems with dead-zone nonlinearity has been solved by Song et al (2017) and Azhdari and Binazadeh (2020a). Solving the time-varying output tracking problem for sandwich systems with sandwiched saturation function has been investigated by Azhdari and Binazadeh (2020b; 2020c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tracking problem of sandwich systems with dead-zone nonlinearity has been solved by Song et al (2017) and Azhdari and Binazadeh (2020a). Solving the time-varying output tracking problem for sandwich systems with sandwiched saturation function has been investigated by Azhdari and Binazadeh (2020b; 2020c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several solutions have been proposed according to this approach. [11][12][13][14] One of these approach drawbacks is the need for generation of the reference signal and its derivatives up to the relative degree of the system. Therefore, another approach was proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important control objectives that have been considered in the control of dynamic systems are improving the robustness of systems, improving transient responses, and reducing the steady-state error. To achieve the desired characteristic of the control system, there are several control methods such as sliding mode control (Binazadeh and Shafiei, 2013, 2014; Dastaviz and Binazadeh, 2019, 2020; Mohammadpour and Binazadeh, 2018; Shtessel et al, 2014), Lyapunov redesign (Binazadeh and Rahgoshay, 2016; Kamarudin et al, 2019), H control (Gholami and Binazadeh, 2019; Aidoud and Sedraoui 2018; Saravanakumar et al, 2018), adaptive control (Adloo and Shafiei 2019; Azhdari and Binazadeh, 2020; Guo and Wen, 2011) and Linear matrix inequality (LMI)-based control (Asadinia and Binazadeh, 2019; Baleghi and Shafiei, 2018; Motahhari and Shafiei, 2020) that focus on the robustness of the closed-loop systems in the presence of uncertain terms and/or external disturbances. These methods have usually been designed based on Lyapunov analysis to meet the desired system performances that lead to the elimination of steady-state error in tracking or regulation problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%