2010
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.201000343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Robust Generic Model Control of High‐Purity Internal Thermally Coupled Distillation Column

Abstract: The internal thermally coupled distillation column (ITCDIC) is a frontier in energy-saving distillation research. The process inside a high-purity ITCDIC is of great nonlinear dynamics, which trouble the conventional control schemes. A multivariable adaptive robust generic model control (ARGMC) is presented to solve the difficulties, where an ARX model is derived and a recursive least squares estimation (RLSE) method is introduced. The benzene/toluene system is studied as an illustrative example. The results o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The terminal concentrations by wave model, namelyŶ t 1 , andX t n are very close to the actual final concentrations of Y t 1 , and X t n which confirms the validity of the simplified wave model. For the same section of the column, for example, the rectifying section (stages [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], the moving distances of the profiles are quite different when Z f increases and decreases 2%, respectively. When Z f increases 2%, the moving distance is shorter (20.98-18.72, got from Table 3), which makes the deviation relatively small; On the contrary, when Z f decreases 2% the moving distance is longer (18.72-12.88) and it leads to a larger deviation.…”
Section: The Disturbance With the Same Magnitude And Opposite Directionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The terminal concentrations by wave model, namelyŶ t 1 , andX t n are very close to the actual final concentrations of Y t 1 , and X t n which confirms the validity of the simplified wave model. For the same section of the column, for example, the rectifying section (stages [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], the moving distances of the profiles are quite different when Z f increases and decreases 2%, respectively. When Z f increases 2%, the moving distance is shorter (20.98-18.72, got from Table 3), which makes the deviation relatively small; On the contrary, when Z f decreases 2% the moving distance is longer (18.72-12.88) and it leads to a larger deviation.…”
Section: The Disturbance With the Same Magnitude And Opposite Directionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There are two aspects that determine the whole process: the moving distances of the profiles depicted by the movement of the inflection points of S 1 and S 2 , and the wave velocities described by Eqs. (13) and (14). Different positions of the inflection points represent different steady states, and the wave velocities describe how the wave profiles move between different steady states.…”
Section: The Disturbance With the Same Magnitude And Opposite Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations