2005
DOI: 10.1002/mus.20441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive response of human tendon to paralysis

Abstract: To gain insight into the adaptive response of human tendon to paralysis, we compared the mechanical properties of the in vivo patellar tendon in six men who were spinal cord-injured (SCI) and eight agematched, able-bodied men. Measurements were taken by combining dynamometry, electrical stimulation, and ultrasonography. Tendon stiffness and Young's modulus, calculated from force-elongation and stress-strain curves, respectively, were lower by 77% (P Ͻ 0.01) and 59% (P Ͻ 0.05) in the SCI than able-bodied subjec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
60
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(71 reference statements)
7
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For these VE-PC MRI studies, the Young's modulus showed a 17% reduction for the Achilles tendon ( Figure 5, Shin et al 2008a) and 29% reduction for the distal aponeurosis (Kinugasa et al 2010) after 4-wk unloading. The extent of decline found in these studies is similar to that reported by Kubo et al (2002Kubo et al ( , 2004, who studied humans subjected to 20 days of bed rest (-28%), but it is much more moderate than the percent decline reported in studies of 90 days simulated microgravity (-58%, Reeves et al 2005) and paralysis (-59%, Maganaris et al 2006). This suggests that the extent of stiffness decrease may have a direct correlation to the duration of unloading.…”
Section: Adaptations Of Tendon and Aponeurosis Under Unloading And Resupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For these VE-PC MRI studies, the Young's modulus showed a 17% reduction for the Achilles tendon ( Figure 5, Shin et al 2008a) and 29% reduction for the distal aponeurosis (Kinugasa et al 2010) after 4-wk unloading. The extent of decline found in these studies is similar to that reported by Kubo et al (2002Kubo et al ( , 2004, who studied humans subjected to 20 days of bed rest (-28%), but it is much more moderate than the percent decline reported in studies of 90 days simulated microgravity (-58%, Reeves et al 2005) and paralysis (-59%, Maganaris et al 2006). This suggests that the extent of stiffness decrease may have a direct correlation to the duration of unloading.…”
Section: Adaptations Of Tendon and Aponeurosis Under Unloading And Resupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Previously, the reduction in stiffness was reported mainly from ultrasound studies in humans (Kubo et al 2002(Kubo et al , 2004Maganaris et al 2006;Reeves et al 2005) as well as in some animal studies (Ameida-Silveira et al 2000;Woo et al 1982). Recently, the tendon mechanical properties were measured with the stress-strain relationship established from the VE-PC MRI studies.…”
Section: Adaptations Of Tendon and Aponeurosis Under Unloading And Rementioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, unlike in muscles, it has to be ensured that the exercise intervention implements tendon strains corresponding to high mechanical loading (intensities of at least 80-90% of MVC) to induce tendon adaptation (Arampatzis et al, 2007a;Grosset et al, 2014). Similar to adaptations to loading, a relatively fast deterioration in the tendon mechanical, material and morphological properties has been shown during bed rest and paralysis (Kubo et al, 2000;Maganaris et al, 2006;Reeves et al, 2005), as well as trainingdetraining studies (Kubo et al, 2012). Such fast adaptation caused by high loads and deterioration following disuse or detraining indicates that the homeostatic response to changes in mechanical loading is a relatively quick process, occurring within 12-14 weeks, in both younger and older adults.…”
Section: Control Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although likely to be an oversimplification, the use of a single 'reference' point is a necessary step in obtaining measurements to permit calculation of tendon stiffness and modulus, with many current variations on the in vivo approach. It also allows specific questions to be answered relating to the variations in tendon properties between different populations Karamanidis and Arampatzis, 2006;Maganaris et al, 2006), or changes in tendon properties as a result of interventions (Arampatzis et al, 2007;Kubo et al, 2002;Reeves et al, 2005;Wiesinger et al, 2015). However, the implicit assumption with this approach is that tendon elongations are homogeneous, or at least representative of the entire tendon, which may not always be the case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%