2004
DOI: 10.1667/rr3141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Response in Embryogenesis: V. Existence of Two Efficient Dose-Rate Ranges for 0.3 Gy of Priming Irradiation to Adapt Mouse Fetuses

Abstract: The adaptive response is an important phenomenon in radiobiology. A study of the conditions essential for the induction of an adaptive response is of critical importance to understanding the novel biological defense mechanisms against the hazardous effects of radiation. In our previous studies, the specific dose and timing of radiation for induction of an adaptive response were studied in ICR mouse fetuses. We found that exposure of the fetuses on embryonic day 11 to a priming dose of 0.3 Gy significantly supp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later AR in utero was verified and confirmed in different laboratories (Mitchel et al., ; Okazaki et al., ). In a series of investigations during characterization of our AR fetal mouse model, results are accumulating that (1) there exist efficient doses and dose rates for delivery of the priming irradiations, (2) Trp53 is essential for AR induction, (3) reduction of prenatal death and malformation is due to inhibition of radiation‐induced Trp53‐dependent apoptosis, (4) signal transduction and Trp53‐related pathways are involved in the AR induction, (5) phosphorylation of Trp53 protein is responsible for inhibition of radiation‐induced Trp53‐dependent apoptosis (Wang et al., ; Wang et al., ; Wang et al., ; Wang et al., ; Wang et al., ; Varès et al., ; Varès et al., ). These data obtained so far indicate that AR in fetal mice is a complicated phenomenon resulted from the interplay among the animal (strain and developmental stage), radiation (dose and dose rate), and timing for delivery of irradiations (interval between the priming dose and the challenge dose).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later AR in utero was verified and confirmed in different laboratories (Mitchel et al., ; Okazaki et al., ). In a series of investigations during characterization of our AR fetal mouse model, results are accumulating that (1) there exist efficient doses and dose rates for delivery of the priming irradiations, (2) Trp53 is essential for AR induction, (3) reduction of prenatal death and malformation is due to inhibition of radiation‐induced Trp53‐dependent apoptosis, (4) signal transduction and Trp53‐related pathways are involved in the AR induction, (5) phosphorylation of Trp53 protein is responsible for inhibition of radiation‐induced Trp53‐dependent apoptosis (Wang et al., ; Wang et al., ; Wang et al., ; Wang et al., ; Wang et al., ; Varès et al., ; Varès et al., ). These data obtained so far indicate that AR in fetal mice is a complicated phenomenon resulted from the interplay among the animal (strain and developmental stage), radiation (dose and dose rate), and timing for delivery of irradiations (interval between the priming dose and the challenge dose).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, damaging or lethal cellular effects are observed following high radiation doses (Cuttler & Pollycove 2003), while cellular stimulatory effects are observed following low-dose-short-term exposures in the range 0.01 -0.50 Gy (1 -50 rad). These stimulatory effects include adaptive responses (Shadley et al 1987, Sankaranarayanan et al 1989, Wang et al 1991, Ikushima et al 1996, Wang et al 2004 ), activation of immune functions (Liu et al 1987, James & Makinodan 1988, Safwat 2000, Ibuki & Goto 2004, Ina & Sakai 2004, Kojima et al 2004, Ina et al 2005, stimulation of growth (Luckey 1982), enhancement of resistance to high-dose radiation (Yonezawa et al 1990(Yonezawa et al , 1996, prevention of brain disorders (Ibuki & Goto 1994), and an increase in the life span of mice (Tiku & Kale 2004). This phenomenon of beneficial biological effects of low-dose radiation has generally been termed as 'radiation hormesis', and little is known about its mechanism(s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cells within the RMS after long-term EMF exposure, both applied at P7 rats, show the boundary between non-genotoxic and genotoxic doses of irradiation. Irradiation, as a genotoxic agent, activates the cell-cycle checkpoint and results in temporary cell growth arrest, which allows DNA repair before proliferation or induces cell apoptosis (Erenpreisa and Cragg 2001;Uberti et al 2001;Wang et al 2004). Our data suggest that due to the cumulative effect of 3 days (8 h/day) of irradiation, surviving stem cells are unable to regenerate and migrate even after 3 weeks postirradiation so we consider the dose as genotoxic.…”
Section: Age-and Dose-dependency Of Post-irradiation Neurogenesis Dynmentioning
confidence: 87%