2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2010.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive resource provisioning for read intensive multi-tier applications in the cloud

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
115
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
115
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We choose to use extra-small VMs only because they offer the most cost-effective way to execute RUBiS workload. For example, the price of The delay settings for our RUBiS application are consistent with prior studies [51,122].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…We choose to use extra-small VMs only because they offer the most cost-effective way to execute RUBiS workload. For example, the price of The delay settings for our RUBiS application are consistent with prior studies [51,122].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The life cycle management of workloads can be categorised into two overlapping phases. Admission control [62], which is the decision to accept a new workload if it contributes to the current management objectives and resource adaptation [10], which reconfigures the infrastructure after a state change. Several proposals treat admission control as distinct phase and assume availability of free resources.…”
Section: Vm Adaptation -Cpu and Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [29], the authors propose a proactive controller that provisions based on peak load seen in the last hour, with a reactive controller for sudden bursts, but it had no ability to scale down CPU/memory resources. In [26,62], the authors extend this approach and use a reactive controller for scaling up and a proactive controller for scaling down, by removing whole VMs. The authors claim this hybrid approach is able to cope with sudden bursts as well as being able to conserve energy by proactively switching nodes off.…”
Section: Adaptation Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carrera et al [12] presented a utilitybased web application placement approach to maximize application performance on clusters of PMs. Iqbal et al [24] proposed an approach for multi-tier web applications, which uses response time and CPU utilization metrics to determine the bottleneck tier and then scales it by provisioning a new VM. Calinescu et al [11] presented a tool-supported framework for QoS management and optimization of self-adaptive service-based systems.…”
Section: Vm Provisioning Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%