2011
DOI: 10.1109/tmm.2010.2082350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Resource Allocation for Layer-Encoded IPTV Multicasting in IEEE 802.16 WiMAX Wireless Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider a SVC multicasting service over a WiMAX network with the same wireless system parameters described in [3], where 7 level of MCSs in WiMAX standard are chosen. The channel quality is quantized to corresponding seven levels G = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We consider a SVC multicasting service over a WiMAX network with the same wireless system parameters described in [3], where 7 level of MCSs in WiMAX standard are chosen. The channel quality is quantized to corresponding seven levels G = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The allocation rule takes the system state s as input and outputs the corresponding MCS for each layer. In a utility-based system [3], [4], a common and reasonable choice of D is the overall utility maximization, that is,…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Deb et al (2008) modeled the multicast resource allocation problem as an optimization problem and presented a fast greedy algorithm to maximize total utility. Kuo et al (2011) proposed a utility-based resource allocation scheme which firstly served all base layers and then offered additional enhancement layers to certain scheduled users by maximizing the marginal utility. However, reliability and throughput capacity of layered video multicasting could be further improved by collaborating with erasure coding (Ge et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%