2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-pel.2019.1401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive repetitive controller for an active power filter in three phase four wire systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to other filters, these filters are also treated as improving the harmonics and are economic, though their performance is not satisfactory in the presence of nonlinear loads. Present APFs are suitable for compensating dynamically up to 25th-harmonics order [109,110]. Moreover, these have higher power ratings and have wide commercial use.…”
Section: Technical and Economic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to other filters, these filters are also treated as improving the harmonics and are economic, though their performance is not satisfactory in the presence of nonlinear loads. Present APFs are suitable for compensating dynamically up to 25th-harmonics order [109,110]. Moreover, these have higher power ratings and have wide commercial use.…”
Section: Technical and Economic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, excellent harmonic current tracking performance cannot be completely achieved by the PR controller. In addition, in a three-phase four-wire system, a repetitive (RT) controller [20] was adopted. This controller can provide the steady-state tracking accuracy for the harmonic current control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results, a combination of a feedback linearization technique and pole-zero cancellation using passive damping was proposed to solve the closed-loop performance inconsistency problem by assigning a constant cut-off frequency to each loop in a low-pass filter (LPF) form [10,11]. The PMSM true parameter dependence on the feedback gains and feed-forward terms may degrade the closed-loop performance in actual implementation; however, this can be alleviated by incorporating additional novel online parameter estimators as in [12][13][14]. Moreover, the constant inner loop cut-off frequency (for current control) should be increased to expand the feasible outer loop cut-off frequency range for improved speed transient performance; an increased current cut-off frequency may magnify the current ripple (resulting in switching loss) and degrade the relative closed-loop stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%