2009
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2009.2018641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Reduced-Rank Processing Based on Joint and Iterative Interpolation, Decimation, and Filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
270
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(272 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
270
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The joint domain localized (JDL) approach, which is a beamspace reduced-dimension algorithm, was proposed by Wang and Cai [22] and investigated in both homogeneous and nonhomogeneous environments in [23], [24], respectively. Recently, reduced-rank filtering algorithms based on joint iterative optimization of adaptive filters [25], [26] and based on an adaptive diversity-combined decimation and interpolation scheme [27], [28] were proposed, respectively.…”
Section: Reduced-rank Signal Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The joint domain localized (JDL) approach, which is a beamspace reduced-dimension algorithm, was proposed by Wang and Cai [22] and investigated in both homogeneous and nonhomogeneous environments in [23], [24], respectively. Recently, reduced-rank filtering algorithms based on joint iterative optimization of adaptive filters [25], [26] and based on an adaptive diversity-combined decimation and interpolation scheme [27], [28] were proposed, respectively.…”
Section: Reduced-rank Signal Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The joint domain localized (JDL) approach, which is a beamspace reduced-dimension algorithm, was proposed by Wang and Cai [22] and investigated in both homogeneous and nonhomogeneous environments in [23], [24], respectively. Recently, reduced-rank adaptive processing algorithms based on joint iterative optimization of adaptive filters [25], [26] and based on an adaptive diversity-combined decimation and interpolation scheme [27], [28] were proposed, respectively. In our prior work [26], a joint iterative optimization of adaptive filters STAP scheme using the linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV) was considered and applied to airborne radar applications, resulting in a significant improvement both in convergence speed and SINR performance as compared with the existing reduced-rank STAP algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduced-rank signal processing techniques [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] provide a way to address some of the problems mentioned above. Reduced dimension methods are often needed to speed up the convergence of beamforming algorithms and reduce their computational complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It offers a large reduction in the required number of training samples over full-rank methods [2], which may also addresses the problem of snapshot deficiency at low complexity. Several reduced-rank strategies for processing data collected from a large number of sensors have been reported in the last few years, which include beamspace methods [7], Krylov subspace techniques [13,14] and methods of joint and iterative optimization of parameters in [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outra estratégia de redução de complexidade foi proposta em [36]. Nesse caso, são utilizadas técnicas de redução de dimensionalidade [58] de forma a se alcançar melhores relações custo-benefício entre complexidade e desempenho.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified