2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13753-018-0204-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Process for SMART Community Governance under Persistent Disruptive Risks

Abstract: This article addresses the increasing need for participatory approaches to disaster reduction at the community level.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li postulated that perceived quality constitutes residents' overall perception of smart communities and their subjective feelings about the experience of providing smart services [2] . It encapsulates the actual feelings residents derive from managing communities and providing services, forming the direct basis for residents' expectations of smart communities and their pre-service requirements [10] .…”
Section: Influencing Factors Of Residents' Willingness To Participate...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li postulated that perceived quality constitutes residents' overall perception of smart communities and their subjective feelings about the experience of providing smart services [2] . It encapsulates the actual feelings residents derive from managing communities and providing services, forming the direct basis for residents' expectations of smart communities and their pre-service requirements [10] .…”
Section: Influencing Factors Of Residents' Willingness To Participate...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Okada's keynote (Okada 2004) he presented the concept of an implementation knowledge gap as a "valley between knowledge producers and end-users." Okada has continued to speak and write about implementation in many settings with many colleagues (samples: Matsuda and Okada 2006, Gopalakrishnan and Okada 2007, Okada, Fang, and Kilgour 2013, Okada 2018). And he is not alone.…”
Section: Views From Our Discussantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cycle can be entered at any point but it is critical for adaptation that it be repeated. Okada (2018) has called such adaptive processes "dynamic spiral processes of Plan-Do-Check-Action (PDCA) cycles." In a unit of the PDCA cyclic process, there are two "Implementation-intended Do's", one is "to do" based on "to plan," and another is "action " back to "plan" based on "to "check."…”
Section: Achieving Better Collaboration and Coordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of risk governance includes both the institutional structure and the policy process that guide and restrain the collective activities of a group, society, or international community to regulate, reduce, or control risk problems (Renn and Klinke 2014;Klinke and Renn 2018). Contemporary handling of collectively relevant risk problems has been shifted away from traditional state-centric approaches with hierarchically organized governmental agencies to separately constituted public bodies with overlapping jurisdictions and vertical governance structures that link the community level to regional, national, and international levels, which do not match the traditional hierarchical order but constitute polyarchical structures (Hooghe and Marks 2003;Skelcher 2005;Okada 2018). This implicates an increasingly multilayered and diversified sociopolitical landscape in which a multitude of actors, each individual with their own perceptions and evaluations, draw on a diversity of knowledge and evidence claims, value commitments, and political interests in order to influence processes of risk analysis, decision making, and risk management (Jasanoff 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Risk problems that affect different urban constituencies at the same time can be managed in accordance with each unique set of spatial conditions specificity; (2) An inherent degree of overlap and redundancy makes nonhierarchical adaptive and integrative risk governance systems more resilient and therefore less vulnerable (Renn and Klinke 2014); (3) The larger number of actors facilitates experimentation and learning (Renn 2008); (4) This approach includes the experiences from direct community-building efforts and links the various agency levels into an integrated structure of governance (Higo et al 2017;Okada 2018); (5) This approach is sensitive to different cultural contexts and community situations (Renn and Schweizer 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%