2016
DOI: 10.52842/conf.ecaade.2016.1.549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Pneumatic Shell Structures - Feedback-driven robotic stiffening of inflated extensible membranes and further rigidification for architectural applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the streams of robotic fabrication in architecture has been the novel combination of computational techniques into integrated design, test, adapt and fabricate systems. Some studies have ventured into adaptive stacking of architectural elements, in an exploratory open framework (Narahara 2013), or attempted to create an integrated framework of computationally driven, robotic actuation and fiberstiffening process of shell-like inflatable structures (Poinet et al 2016), after a critique of post-rationalized geometry input into fabrication methods, where the focus is on saving material, being economical due to constraints. Again shell geometries seem to be a good target selected by the CAAD community for robotic fabrication, for example integrating behavioral design and adaptive robotic fabrication of a compression shell, with the aid of a pneumatic formwork (Doerstelmann et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the streams of robotic fabrication in architecture has been the novel combination of computational techniques into integrated design, test, adapt and fabricate systems. Some studies have ventured into adaptive stacking of architectural elements, in an exploratory open framework (Narahara 2013), or attempted to create an integrated framework of computationally driven, robotic actuation and fiberstiffening process of shell-like inflatable structures (Poinet et al 2016), after a critique of post-rationalized geometry input into fabrication methods, where the focus is on saving material, being economical due to constraints. Again shell geometries seem to be a good target selected by the CAAD community for robotic fabrication, for example integrating behavioral design and adaptive robotic fabrication of a compression shell, with the aid of a pneumatic formwork (Doerstelmann et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the streams of robotic fabrication in architecture has been the novel combination of computational techniques into integrated design, test, adapt and fabricate systems. Some studies have ventured into adaptive stacking of architectural elements, in an exploratory open framework (Narahara 2013), or attempted to create an integrated framework of computationally driven, robotic actuation and fiberstiffening process of shell-like inflatable structures (Poinet et al 2016), after a critique of post-rationalized geometry input into fabrication methods, where the focus is on saving material, being economical due to constraints. Again shell geometries seem to be a good target selected by the CAAD community for robotic fabrication, for example integrating behavioral design and adaptive robotic fabrication of a compression shell, with the aid of a pneumatic formwork (Doerstelmann et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%