2011
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.1583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive output feedback stabilization for a class of nonlinear systems with inherent nonlinearities and uncertainties

Abstract: SUMMARYThis paper investigates the problem of adaptive stabilization by output feedback for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems. The distinguishing feature of such a class of systems is the presence of uncertain control coefficient and unmeasured states dependent growth with growth rate of polynomial-of-output multiplying an unknown constant. First, new high-gain K-filters with two dynamic gains are introduced, and an appropriate state observer is constructed based on the K-filters. Then, motivated by the u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, these uncertain or nonlinear output functions satisfy Assumption . On the other hand, system with Assumption also covers a class of nonlinear systems with unknown control coefficients , for example, the system trueẋ1=θ1x2,3.0235pttrueẋ2=θ2u,3.0235pty=x1 can be transformed into ż1=z2,3.0235ptż2=u,3.0235pty=θ1θ2z1 by z1=x1θ1θ2 and z2=x2θ2. In the case of output feedback control for feedforward nonlinear time‐delay systems, the existing results allow usually the growth rate only including either an unknown constant or input functions c ( u ) and truec˜(u(tτ)), for example, .…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Key Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, these uncertain or nonlinear output functions satisfy Assumption . On the other hand, system with Assumption also covers a class of nonlinear systems with unknown control coefficients , for example, the system trueẋ1=θ1x2,3.0235pttrueẋ2=θ2u,3.0235pty=x1 can be transformed into ż1=z2,3.0235ptż2=u,3.0235pty=θ1θ2z1 by z1=x1θ1θ2 and z2=x2θ2. In the case of output feedback control for feedforward nonlinear time‐delay systems, the existing results allow usually the growth rate only including either an unknown constant or input functions c ( u ) and truec˜(u(tτ)), for example, .…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Key Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the control scheme proposed by [6], universal adaptive high-gain observers were introduced to achieve global output feedback stabilization in [7,8]. For a larger class of nonlinear systems with unknown control coefficients, the global state regulation problem was investigated by output feedback in [9][10][11]. Furthermore, a universal adaptive output feedback controller was constructed for a class of nonlinear systems with unknown time delays and output function in [12], and an output feedback controller was proposed by introducing double dynamic gains in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is necessary to impose some extra restrictive conditions on nonlinear terms to obtain global output feedback controller. In the case when uncertain nonlinear systems dominated by a lower-triangular system with linear growth in unmeasured states, the problems of global output feedback stabilization or regulation have been addressed in [2][3][4][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Specifically, using a feedback domination design method, the global exponential stabilizer was constructed under the linear growth condition with known growth rate in [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, the problem of global output feedback control of nonlinear systems with linear unmeasurable states multiplying by the various growth functions has received considerable attention and still remains as an active research topic (see e. g., [1,2,9,10,11,12,13,15,16,18,22,23,24,25,26]). For example, a time-varying output feedback controller has been proposed for the global regulation of nonlinear uncertain systems DOI: 10.14736/kyb-2015- with an unbounded time-varying delay in the input in [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%