2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2014.12.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive optimisation of a generalised phase contrast beam shaping system

Abstract: The generalised phase contrast (GPC) method provides versatile and efficient light shaping for a range of applications. We have implemented a generalised phase contrast system that used two passes on a single spatial light modulator (SLM). Both the pupil phase distribution and the phase contrast filter were generated by the SLM. This provided extra flexibility and control over the parameters of the system including the phase step magnitude, shape, radius and position of the filter. A feedback method for the on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, the experimental principle includes three main issues: the design of the double-ring phase-aperture, the diffraction theory for phase element, and the coherent combination between the vortex beam and Gaussian beam 19 21 …”
Section: Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the experimental principle includes three main issues: the design of the double-ring phase-aperture, the diffraction theory for phase element, and the coherent combination between the vortex beam and Gaussian beam 19 21 …”
Section: Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our demonstrations are designed for speci c wavelengths and input beam sizes, implementations that allow more input freedom, have also been demonstrated recently [78,79] and were achieved with an adaptive PCF. Hybrid light shaping techniques where the ltering plane is on an SLM would also bene t from having a tunable PCF.…”
Section: Gpc Experimental Demonstrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(8) can lead to possible further optimization of the CPI, although this is beyond the scope of this Communication. With the use of a dynamic PCF, by using a SLM for example [29], A can be adjusted so that matched amplitude is still achieved. However, this presents a drawback in possible losses in the system and a more complex implementation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%