2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-95630-1_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Model for Vehicle Theft Prediction and Recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the traditional networks performed less well than YOLO-Robbery structures. The proposed YOLO-Robbery increases the overall accuracy range by 13.15%, 2.15%, and 6.24 better than CLSTM-NN [16], J. DCNN [19], and ANFIS [22] respectively.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the traditional networks performed less well than YOLO-Robbery structures. The proposed YOLO-Robbery increases the overall accuracy range by 13.15%, 2.15%, and 6.24 better than CLSTM-NN [16], J. DCNN [19], and ANFIS [22] respectively.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2021, Saminu, A., et al, [22] suggested ANFIS and AI were used to create a model for reducing the amount of time investigations take and the number of security personnel needed to achieve a high success rate in the prediction, detection, and recovery of stolen automobiles. In comparison to Naive Bayes, Random Tree J48, and Decision Rule, the ANFIS exhibits a substantial accuracy result of 92.91%.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%