2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive neural dynamic surface control of MIMO pure-feedback nonlinear systems with output constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, many researchers are dedicated to handling the control problem of uncertain nonlinear system by combining the back-stepping technique and universal function approximators, that is, neural networks (NNs), [6][7][8][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and fuzzy logic systems (FLSs). [19][20][21] However, most of approximation-based back-stepping control techniques focus on strict feedback nonlinear systems [6][7][8][12][13][14][19][20][21] or pure feedback nonlinear systems without the consideration of prescribed performance, [15][16][17][18] and less attention was paid to approximation-based prescribed performance back-stepping control for pure feedback nonlinear systems. In addition, the existing approximation-based back-stepping controllers for pure feedback nonlinear systems remain the problems of approximation errors, "explosion of complexity" and algebraic loop.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, many researchers are dedicated to handling the control problem of uncertain nonlinear system by combining the back-stepping technique and universal function approximators, that is, neural networks (NNs), [6][7][8][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and fuzzy logic systems (FLSs). [19][20][21] However, most of approximation-based back-stepping control techniques focus on strict feedback nonlinear systems [6][7][8][12][13][14][19][20][21] or pure feedback nonlinear systems without the consideration of prescribed performance, [15][16][17][18] and less attention was paid to approximation-based prescribed performance back-stepping control for pure feedback nonlinear systems. In addition, the existing approximation-based back-stepping controllers for pure feedback nonlinear systems remain the problems of approximation errors, "explosion of complexity" and algebraic loop.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Q n is a function defined as Q n (ē n , u,z n , ω) = k n e n +f n (x n , u,z n ) −α n−1 + ω, (28) wheref n is the nth element off in (13), k n > 0 is the nth positive feedback gain,ē n = [e 1 , . .…”
Section: B Modified Adi Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonaffine-in-control nonlinear systems are very common in practical engineering, such as flight vehicles [22], hypersonic vehicles [23], and electromechanical systems [24]. Some of the studies for nonaffine nonlinear systems have utilized the neural network and fuzzy control based methods, such as adaptive neural control [25], [26], adaptive fuzzy control [27], adaptive neural dynamic surface control [28], etc. Nevertheless, the heavy computational burdens resulting from adaptive fuzzy or neural weights are unacceptable in practical implementation [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonaffine‐in‐control nonlinear systems are very common in practical engineering, such as manipulator, flight vehicle, hypersonic vehicle, and electromechanical system . Some of the studies for nonaffine nonlinear systems have utilized the neural network and fuzzy control scheme–based methods, such as adaptive neural control, adaptive fuzzy control, and adaptive neural dynamic surface control . Nevertheless, the heavy computational burdens resulted from adaptive fuzzy or neural weights are unacceptable in practical implementation …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 Some of the studies for nonaffine nonlinear systems have utilized the neural network and fuzzy control scheme-based methods, such as adaptive neural control, 20,21 adaptive fuzzy control, 17,22 and adaptive neural dynamic surface control. 23 Nevertheless, the heavy computational burdens resulted from adaptive fuzzy or neural weights are unacceptable in practical implementation. 19 The objective of this paper is to develop a feasible redesign procedure to extend the application scope of a class of existing disturbance-rejection algorithms, so that they can be applied to the pure-feedback nonaffine-in-control nonlinear systems (PFNNSs) with matched and mismatched disturbances.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%