2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2008.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive multiresolution schemes with local time stepping for two-dimensional degenerate reaction–diffusion systems

Abstract: MSC: 35K65 35L65 35R05 65M06 76T20 92C17 Keywords: Degenerate parabolic equation Adaptive multiresolution scheme Pattern formation Finite volume schemes Chemotaxis Keller-Segel systems Flame balls interaction Locally varying time steppingSpatially two-dimensional, possibly degenerate reaction-diffusion systems, with a focus on models of combustion, pattern formation and chemotaxis, are solved by a fully adaptive multiresolution scheme. Solutions of these equations exhibit steep gradients, and in the degenerate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(121 reference statements)
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [7], the authors prove for scalar, one-dimensional nonlinear conservation laws, that the threshold error is stable in the sense that the constant C is uniformly bounded and, in particular, does not depend on the threshold value ε R , the number of refinement levels L and the number of time steps n. In our case, even when a rigorous proof is still missing for the system considered in the present work, from the previous deduction and our numerical experiments (see Fig. 2 in Section VI) we see a similar behaviour for C. As in previous works [8,[10][11][12], here the reference tolerance ε R remains fixed for all times. It is certainly possible to recompute ε R at each time step, but this will usually mean that one has to perform additional computations to determine the value of C, and it seems unlikely that this procedure makes the scheme more efficient.…”
Section: Selection Of the Threshold Parametersupporting
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In [7], the authors prove for scalar, one-dimensional nonlinear conservation laws, that the threshold error is stable in the sense that the constant C is uniformly bounded and, in particular, does not depend on the threshold value ε R , the number of refinement levels L and the number of time steps n. In our case, even when a rigorous proof is still missing for the system considered in the present work, from the previous deduction and our numerical experiments (see Fig. 2 in Section VI) we see a similar behaviour for C. As in previous works [8,[10][11][12], here the reference tolerance ε R remains fixed for all times. It is certainly possible to recompute ε R at each time step, but this will usually mean that one has to perform additional computations to determine the value of C, and it seems unlikely that this procedure makes the scheme more efficient.…”
Section: Selection Of the Threshold Parametersupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Moreover, as in [10], we may deduce that the explicit version of the FV method used herein, (3.2)-(3.5), is stable under the CFL condition…”
Section: The Reference Finite Volume Schemementioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations