2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2021.108350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive multichannel detectors for distributed target based on gradient test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we investigate the influence of different detector parameters, including typical models of multiple dominant scatters (MDS) in Table 1, where only h 0 range cells are assumed to have signal components in K range cells. Then for comparison, we consider the existing unstructured subspace detectors (S‐Gradient [18], S‐GLRT [17], S‐Wald [17], S‐2SD [17] and S‐Rao [17]) and the persymmetric subspace detectors (Per‐Rao and Per‐Wald [31]). The false alarm probability P fa is set to 10 −3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, we investigate the influence of different detector parameters, including typical models of multiple dominant scatters (MDS) in Table 1, where only h 0 range cells are assumed to have signal components in K range cells. Then for comparison, we consider the existing unstructured subspace detectors (S‐Gradient [18], S‐GLRT [17], S‐Wald [17], S‐2SD [17] and S‐Rao [17]) and the persymmetric subspace detectors (Per‐Rao and Per‐Wald [31]). The false alarm probability P fa is set to 10 −3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the detectors based on Gradient criteria are also derived for HE and PHE in Ref. [18] and exhibit the effectiveness in presupposed scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can directly obtain Θnormalr0=0pK×1 ${\boldsymbol{\Theta }}_{\mathrm{r}0}={\mathbf{0}}_{pK\times 1}$ and f0(bold-italicZ,bold-italicY)=f1(Z,Y)|Θr=Θnormalr0 ${f}_{0}(\boldsymbol{Z},\boldsymbol{Y})={{f}_{1}(\boldsymbol{Z},\boldsymbol{Y})\vert }_{{\boldsymbol{\Theta }}_{\mathrm{r}}={\boldsymbol{\Theta }}_{\mathrm{r}0}}$, for the target is absent under hypothesis H 0 . Compared with the GLRT, Wald and Rao tests, the Gradient test seems to have much simpler form [21]. Note that the expression in square brackets with boldΘ=boldΘˆ0 $\boldsymbol{\Theta }={\widehat{\boldsymbol{\Theta }}}_{0}$ in Equation (5) has the similar form as the locally most powerful (LMP) test [30–32].…”
Section: Detector Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the clutter-dominant environment, the detectors based on generalised likelihood ratio test (GLRT), Rao test, Wald test and their two-step variations are derived for range-spread targets in HE [20]. Moreover, the Gradient test is applied to detect a range-spread target in the HE [21] without considering the interference. As for the clutter-dominant PHE, the GLRT, Rao test, Wald test and their two-step versions are derived in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation