2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11760-022-02184-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive multi-vehicle motion counting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) Advanced contexts and trustable data sharing: Nowadays, there are many advanced and dynamic contexts available in practice that can be deployed and integrated into our proposed framework. For example, we can have many dynamic contexts in emergencies such as fire alarms, floods, and traffic accidents [17]. These contexts can also be imported from or provided by machine learning applications (in today's deployment, such applications can be executed within the IoT devices, e.g., smart cameras and drones).…”
Section: Discussion On Edge-based Services and Policies Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2) Advanced contexts and trustable data sharing: Nowadays, there are many advanced and dynamic contexts available in practice that can be deployed and integrated into our proposed framework. For example, we can have many dynamic contexts in emergencies such as fire alarms, floods, and traffic accidents [17]. These contexts can also be imported from or provided by machine learning applications (in today's deployment, such applications can be executed within the IoT devices, e.g., smart cameras and drones).…”
Section: Discussion On Edge-based Services and Policies Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Application-level contexts: There are different types of real-time data from a data source that can generate contexts for the policies. These include raw data from sensors such as temperature or data generated by AI services from IoT devices such as the number of people or an accident captured in a camera [17]. We also leverage these application-specific contexts for our policy specification, similar to system-wide ones.…”
Section: Context Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Dundas [20] proposed a custom LOC measure that could be used to evaluate code quality by counting so-called simple lines, condition-based lines, looped-based lines, and exceptionhandling lines. Nguyen et al [13] discussed how logical and physical lines should be counted for different programming languages. Finally, Jones [21] proposed a list of guidelines for counting LOC for different purposes (e.g., counting reusable code, scaffold code, etc.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the standard LOC measures are widely used, they are also often criticized as being sensitive to programming style, programming language, or the presence of generated code [10]- [12]. The community has also observed problems with inconsistency and lack of transparency in the counting algorithms (and tools) [11], [13], [14]. Finally, the study by Barb et al [15] questioned the ability of standard LOC measures to proxy for complexity, size, productivity, and effort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%