Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146)
DOI: 10.1109/robot.1998.680945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive motion control of a nonholonomic vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the virtual system will provide estimates of the unmeasured states of the leader. As in Gusev et al (1998), the first step (kinematic level) considers the velocities ν v of the virtual system as the control inputs, and the control law is designed such that convergence of the virtual trajectories to the leader trajectories is ensured. In a way, the trajectories x v and velocities ν v can be considered as estimates of the leader states x m and ν m .…”
Section: A Kinematic Observer Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, the virtual system will provide estimates of the unmeasured states of the leader. As in Gusev et al (1998), the first step (kinematic level) considers the velocities ν v of the virtual system as the control inputs, and the control law is designed such that convergence of the virtual trajectories to the leader trajectories is ensured. In a way, the trajectories x v and velocities ν v can be considered as estimates of the leader states x m and ν m .…”
Section: A Kinematic Observer Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The virtual system approach has been utilized both as an abstraction vehicle in Crowley (1989), and as an intermediate level between the desired trajectories of a system and the controller. The virtual system can be considered as a low-level controller in a two-level control structure (Fradkov et al, 1991;Gusev et al, 1998). A kinematic observer that reconstructs the velocity of the leader for adaptive formation control has also been designed in Choi et al (2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in Gusev et al (1998), in the first step (kinematic level) we consider the velocitiesq v of the virtual manipulator as the control inputs, and design them in such a way that we ensure convergence of the virtual trajectories to the leader trajectories. In a way, we can consider the trajectories x v and velocitiesq v as estimates of x m andq m , that is, the virtual manipulator is a form of kinematic estimator of the leader states through the position feedback loop.…”
Section: Virtual Manipulator Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The virtual system can be considered as a low-level controller in a two-level control structure (Fradkov et al, 1991;Gusev et al, 1998), and has been used in Sakaguchi et al (1999) as the mapping of a physical vehicle on an entry-ramp on a main lane in order to do merging control of autonomous mobile robots, and in Egerstedt et al (2001) to control a reference point on a planned path. The latter approach has been utilized in Hu et al (2003) to combine the task of path following and obstacle avoidance, and in Cheng et al (2004) with a modified goal point to improve practical robustness to path diversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a way, it can be considered as a low-level controller in a two-level control structure (cf. [13,14]), and was used in [15] as the mapping of a physical vehicle on an entry-ramp on a main lane in order to do merging control of autonomous mobile robots, and in [16] to control a reference point on a planned path. The latter approach has been utilized in [17] to combine the task of path following and obstacle avoidance, and in [18] with a modified goal point to improve practical robustness to path diversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%