“…[3,4,24]. In this subsection we combine the adaptive multilevel algorithm of Section 2.2 with an error estimate derived in [8] that also takes into account the construction of mesh hierarchy sampling on existing meshes Figure 3. Experimental complexity when the algorithm in Section 2.1 is applied to the drift singularity problem in Section 3.2.…”
Section: Stopped Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26]. The idea of extending the MLMC method [11] to hierarchies of adaptively refined, non uniform time discretizations that are generated by the adaptive algorithm introduced in [26,25,8] was first introduced and tested computationally by the authors in [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work [11] proposed and analyzed a MLMC method based on a hierarchy of uniform time discretizations and control variates to reduce the computational effort required by a standard, single level, forward Euler Monte Carlo method from O TOL −3 to O (TOL −1 log(TOL −1 )) 2 for a mean square error of O TOL 2 . Later, the work [17] presented a MLMC method using a hierarchy of adaptively refined, non uniform time discretizations that are generated by the adaptive algorithm introduced in [26,25,8], and, as such, it may be considered a generalization of Giles' work [11]. This work improves the algorithms presented in [17] and furthermore, it provides mathematical analysis of these new adaptive MLMC algorithms.…”
Abstract. We present an adaptive multilevel Monte Carlo (MLMC) method for weak approximations of solutions to Itô stochastic differential equations (SDE). The work [11] proposed and analyzed a MLMC method based on a hierarchy of uniform time discretizations and control variates to reduce the computational effort required by a standard, single level, forward Euler Monte Carlo method from O TOL −3 to O (TOL −1 log(TOL −1 )) 2 for a mean square error of O TOL 2 . Later, the work [17] presented a MLMC method using a hierarchy of adaptively refined, non uniform time discretizations that are generated by the adaptive algorithm introduced in [26,25,8], and, as such, it may be considered a generalization of Giles' work [11]. This work improves the algorithms presented in [17] and furthermore, it provides mathematical analysis of these new adaptive MLMC algorithms. In particular, we show that under some assumptions our adaptive MLMC algorithms are asymptotically accurate and essentially have the correct complexity but with improved control of the complexity constant factor in the asymptotic analysis. Numerical tests include one case with singular drift and one with stopped diffusion, where the complexity of a uniform single level method is O TOL −4 . For both these cases the results confirm the theory, exhibiting savings in the computational cost for achieving the accuracy O (TOL) from O TOL −3 for the adaptive single level algorithm to essentially O TOL −2 log TOL −1 2 for the adaptive MLMC.
“…[3,4,24]. In this subsection we combine the adaptive multilevel algorithm of Section 2.2 with an error estimate derived in [8] that also takes into account the construction of mesh hierarchy sampling on existing meshes Figure 3. Experimental complexity when the algorithm in Section 2.1 is applied to the drift singularity problem in Section 3.2.…”
Section: Stopped Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26]. The idea of extending the MLMC method [11] to hierarchies of adaptively refined, non uniform time discretizations that are generated by the adaptive algorithm introduced in [26,25,8] was first introduced and tested computationally by the authors in [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work [11] proposed and analyzed a MLMC method based on a hierarchy of uniform time discretizations and control variates to reduce the computational effort required by a standard, single level, forward Euler Monte Carlo method from O TOL −3 to O (TOL −1 log(TOL −1 )) 2 for a mean square error of O TOL 2 . Later, the work [17] presented a MLMC method using a hierarchy of adaptively refined, non uniform time discretizations that are generated by the adaptive algorithm introduced in [26,25,8], and, as such, it may be considered a generalization of Giles' work [11]. This work improves the algorithms presented in [17] and furthermore, it provides mathematical analysis of these new adaptive MLMC algorithms.…”
Abstract. We present an adaptive multilevel Monte Carlo (MLMC) method for weak approximations of solutions to Itô stochastic differential equations (SDE). The work [11] proposed and analyzed a MLMC method based on a hierarchy of uniform time discretizations and control variates to reduce the computational effort required by a standard, single level, forward Euler Monte Carlo method from O TOL −3 to O (TOL −1 log(TOL −1 )) 2 for a mean square error of O TOL 2 . Later, the work [17] presented a MLMC method using a hierarchy of adaptively refined, non uniform time discretizations that are generated by the adaptive algorithm introduced in [26,25,8], and, as such, it may be considered a generalization of Giles' work [11]. This work improves the algorithms presented in [17] and furthermore, it provides mathematical analysis of these new adaptive MLMC algorithms. In particular, we show that under some assumptions our adaptive MLMC algorithms are asymptotically accurate and essentially have the correct complexity but with improved control of the complexity constant factor in the asymptotic analysis. Numerical tests include one case with singular drift and one with stopped diffusion, where the complexity of a uniform single level method is O TOL −4 . For both these cases the results confirm the theory, exhibiting savings in the computational cost for achieving the accuracy O (TOL) from O TOL −3 for the adaptive single level algorithm to essentially O TOL −2 log TOL −1 2 for the adaptive MLMC.
“…Stopped diffusion is a good example that adaptive time steps improve the convergence rate, see Buchmann and Petersen [9] and Moon et al [14]. A priori error estimates of the time discretization error in (3) were first derived by Talay and Tubaro [41].…”
Section: Convergence Rates For Adaptive Approximation 513mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which satisfy ik t n = i c j t n X t n k c p t n X t n jp t n+1 + ik c j t n X t n j t n+1 t n < T (14) ik T = ik g X T and ikm t n = i c j t n X t n k c p t n X t n m c r t n X t n jpr t n+1 + im c j t n X t n k c p t n X t n jp t n+1 + i c j t n X t n km c p t n X t n jp t n+1…”
to a problem independent factor defined in the algorithm. Numerical examples illustrate the behavior of the adaptive algorithms, motivating when stochastic and deterministic adaptive time steps are more efficient than constant time steps and when adaptive stochastic steps are more efficient than adaptive deterministic steps.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.