2022
DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2021.3126064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive MIMO Detector Based on Hypernetwork: Design, Simulation, and Experimental Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypernetwork can increase the adaptability of the main network. Avoid retraining the main network when the internal parameters or the number of network layers need to be changed, which greatly reduces the training cost [19], [22]. In addition, there are some hypernetwork solutions that can improve the performance of the main network [25].…”
Section: Hypernetworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hypernetwork can increase the adaptability of the main network. Avoid retraining the main network when the internal parameters or the number of network layers need to be changed, which greatly reduces the training cost [19], [22]. In addition, there are some hypernetwork solutions that can improve the performance of the main network [25].…”
Section: Hypernetworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypernetwork, first proposed in [19], uses one network to generate internal parameters for another network to reduce training costs and improve the flexibility of the layers of the main neural network [20]. To increase the adaptability of machine learning (ML)-based multiple input multiple output (MIMO) detection to different channel environments and noise levels, the authors of [21] and [22] introduced hypernetwork into ML-based MIMO detection and proposed HyperMMNet and HyperEPNet, respectively. The authors in [23] proposed the HyperRNN architecture for an end-to-end downlink channel estimation scheme for massive MIMO frequency division duplex (FDD) systems, achieving lower normalized mean square error (NMSE) for channel estimation and higher sum-rate for beamforming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the unfolded version of the expectation propagation detector was proposed wherein damping factors are learned using meta-learning [142]. This detector was also extended using hypernetworks to achieve generalization to new channel realizations and noise levels but for typical values of many other system parameters [143]. The major drawback here is that DNN must be retrained for each set of new system parameters.…”
Section: Data Detection and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of artificial intelligence (AI) and ML in wireless communications is growing quickly and already an integral part of 5G Release 18 [22]. AI and ML are expected to play and even more central role in 6G systems [2] and research is heavily focusing on ML-based baseband processing, ranging from atomistic (separate and independent) optimizations of neural network (NN)-based MIMO data detectors [23]- [25] or channel decoders [26], to fully NN-based transmitters and receivers (e.g., end-to-end learning methods [27]- [30]), and model-driven deep unfolding approaches [20], [21], [31]. However, existing NN-based data detectors turn out to require orders of magnitude higher complexity compared to classical algorithms that were designed by hand.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the same reason, deep unfolding was utilized to optimize either classical data detection or channel decoding algorithms by hyperparameter tuning, or augment classical algorithms with a hypernetwork. Both methods were applied in [31] for improving a classical expectation propagation (EP) data detector in a deep-unfolded IDD receiver. Other examples for training a traditional LDPC decoder include message damping and weighted belief-propagation decoding [20], [21].…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%