2012
DOI: 10.1002/nme.3163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive mesh refinement and coarsening for cohesive zone modeling of dynamic fracture

Abstract: SUMMARY Adaptive mesh refinement and coarsening schemes are proposed for efficient computational simulation of dynamic cohesive fracture. The adaptive mesh refinement consists of a sequence of edge‐split operators, whereas the adaptive mesh coarsening is based on a sequence of vertex‐removal (or edge‐collapse) operators. Nodal perturbation and edge‐swap operators are also employed around the crack tip region to improve crack geometry representation, and cohesive surface elements are adaptively inserted wheneve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other challenges arise from the complexity of implementing computational procedures for fracture surface evolution, such as remeshing of complex and evolving fracture surfaces (Carter et al 2000), phase field methods (Hakim and Karma 2009), cohesive zone models (Park et al 2012), atomistic (Coffman et al 2008), peridynamics (Youn and Bobaru 2010) and other discrete approaches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other challenges arise from the complexity of implementing computational procedures for fracture surface evolution, such as remeshing of complex and evolving fracture surfaces (Carter et al 2000), phase field methods (Hakim and Karma 2009), cohesive zone models (Park et al 2012), atomistic (Coffman et al 2008), peridynamics (Youn and Bobaru 2010) and other discrete approaches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the Lagrange basis shape functions are used in conjunction with an existing finite element mesh. It should be noted that, for an element split of linear triangular elements, the strain energy is conserved when the Lagrange basis shape functions are utilized . This is because two split elements reproduce the displacement field of the original element.…”
Section: Element Splitting Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that, for an element split of linear triangular elements, the strain energy is conserved when the Lagrange basis shape functions are utilized. 30 This is because two split elements reproduce the displacement field of the original element. However, strain energy conservation is not guaranteed when node relocation is utilized.…”
Section: Element Splitting Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid this problem, alternative approaches have been developed allowing for a locally bounded refinement zone that follows the crack tip. Common strategies use adaptive hierarchical enrichment , self‐adaptive finite elements , adaptive h ‐refinement , or error‐driven adaptive re‐meshing . All these approaches significantly increase the accuracy of the approximation at the crack tip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%