2012
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2011.2176471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Mesh Generation Method Utilizing Magnetic Flux Lines in Two-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the finiteelement analysis [13], [32] and also new methods (for example, the natural element method [33]), the magnetic charges approach considers the integration of (29) and (30) only with reference to the specific regions of interest. In this way, accuracy and time computations can be highly increased and reduced, respectively.…”
Section: Magnetostatic Field Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to the finiteelement analysis [13], [32] and also new methods (for example, the natural element method [33]), the magnetic charges approach considers the integration of (29) and (30) only with reference to the specific regions of interest. In this way, accuracy and time computations can be highly increased and reduced, respectively.…”
Section: Magnetostatic Field Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to the reliability of the FEM simulations regarding this topic, various indices of fitness have been proposed [6]- [12], but the problem of the precision required does not make this method suitable for performing accurate evaluations of the magnetic field relative to unconventional configurations of electrical machines. Furthermore, the option to increase the FEM meshing has its limits [13], because an excessive discretization greatly increases the computation time and can cause a numerical ill-conditioning that produces errors greater than those associated with a less dense mesh. These kinds of problems also arise in other fields, for example, when magnetic fields in synchrotron light sources [14], tokamaks [15]- [19], stellarator [20]- [24], and hybrid tokamak-stellarator [25] have to be evaluated with high precision to study the controlled nuclear fusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where t is the thickness of the whole HTS wire, including the copper stabilizer, silver overlayer, HTS layer, buffer stack and substrate [59]. FEM (finite element method) models [60]- [63] implemented in COMSOL Multiphysics [64]- [67].…”
Section: B T-a Homogenization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, a mesh must be modified depending on the position of mocks captured by the web camera. Some automatic mesh generation methods for the finite element analysis have been proposed [8]- [10]. However, it is difficult to, in real-time, carry out the simulation with such automatic mesh generation methods because it takes long time and large labor to make a mesh.…”
Section: A Mesh Deformation Methods (Steps 3-5)mentioning
confidence: 99%