2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2009.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive mesh coarsening for quadrilateral and hexahedral meshes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected a commonly used mesh quality measure, scaled Jacobian [26], to quantify the resulting mesh quality. The scaled Jacobian is the minimum determinant of the Jacobian matrix evaluated at each corner and the center of an element, divided by the corresponding edge lengths [27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We selected a commonly used mesh quality measure, scaled Jacobian [26], to quantify the resulting mesh quality. The scaled Jacobian is the minimum determinant of the Jacobian matrix evaluated at each corner and the center of an element, divided by the corresponding edge lengths [27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elements are preferred to have scaled Jacobian values close to 1.0 for the best accuracy in analysis (>0.6 in practice). Values between 0.0 and 0.2 are considered poor because they may result in questionable accuracy in FE analysis in the corresponding regions [26]. For this study, we defined mesh quality to be satisfactory when at least 95% of the elements had a scaled Jacobian greater than 0.6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A naive approach is to project the new vertices onto all of the faces of the input mesh with the minimal distance (Hoppe, et al, 1993), which may produce some fold-overs triangles if the points are too far away from the surface. However, in practice the projection operator can be stabilized by constraining the movement of the points on their tangent planes (Remacle, et al, 2012;Shepherd, et al, 2010). Although no theoretical guarantees can be provided, this makes sure that the points do not move too far away from the surface, such that the projection can be safely evaluated.…”
Section: Implementing Aeap Mannermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that with the proposed techniques, we do not modify the elements on the previous level. In this sense, we could use general-purpose techniques to modify the current hexahedral mesh [41][42][43]. However, with our template based approach (specific-purpose) we explicitly determine the desired mesh.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%