1974
DOI: 10.1109/tcom.1974.1092267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Maximum-Likelihood Receiver for Carrier-Modulated Data-Transmission Systems

Abstract: A new look is taken at maximum-likelihood sequence estimation in the presence of intersymbol interference. A uniform receiver structure for linear carrier-modulated data-transmission systems is derived which for decision making uses a modified version of the Viterbi algorithm. The algorithm operates directly on .the output signal of a complex matched filter and, in contrast to the original algorithm, requires no squaring operations; only multiplications by discrete pulse-amplitude values.are needed. Decoding o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
228
0
10

Year Published

1992
1992
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 595 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
228
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…We first derive the optimal maximum-likelihood sequence detector [18]- [20]. Conditioned on the channel coefficients and 2 A pilot signal may be used to estimate these channel coefficients.…”
Section: A Optimal Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We first derive the optimal maximum-likelihood sequence detector [18]- [20]. Conditioned on the channel coefficients and 2 A pilot signal may be used to estimate these channel coefficients.…”
Section: A Optimal Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the symbol sequence, the log-likelihood function can be written as (9) where . Neglecting the terms independent of the symbol sequence, we can reduce this expression to obtain an iterative metric given by [18], [20] (10)…”
Section: A Optimal Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The upper bound is tight for moderate-to-large signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In order to understand the optimal performance of the VA and the important concept of error event, we repeat Forney's performance analysis on the VA below (see also [61]). …”
Section: Error Performance Of the Viterbi Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this lattice viewpoint, the 2 MLSE problem can be transformed into the closest lattice point problem. Making use of the regular structure of a lattice, we propose very efficient MLSE algorithms whose complexities are essentially independent of the number of transmit levels m. Obviously, these algorithms significantly simplify the implementation of an optimal receiver, especially for multi-level modulation schemes, as compared with the other algorithms known so far [27], [61], [1]. Nonetheless, the performance of our algorithms does depend on m. As an interesting result, unlike the VA whose complexity increases rapidly with m, the new algorithms favor m to be as large as possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%