Adaptive low‐complexity motion estimation algorithm for high efficiency video coding encoder

Efficient AMP decision and search range adjustment algorithm for HEVC

“…13). Meanwhile, according to the [26,27,29] in RA case (the blank is zero that means no change) data comparisons from Fig. 12, we can see that in respects of PSNR loss achievement of our proposed algorithm is nearly same as that of algorithm in [27].…”

“…From Fig. 11, it is obvious that other than the algorithm in [27], the coding time is generally saved more by the proposed algorithm than that by algorithms in [26,29], but the bitrate increase by our method is significantly less than that by the method in [27] (as shown in Fig. 13).…”

“…11, 12, and 13 that the coding efficiency comparison between the proposed algorithm and the state-of-the-art algorithms in Ref. [26,27,29] under RA configuration and Figs. 11, 12, and 13 reflect the comparisons about coding time reduction, Bjontegaard Delta PSNR, and Bjontegaard Delta Bitrate, respectively.…”

“…Two individual algorithms are proposed in Ref. [27] that obtain the best performance collaboratively. A better balance is stated between computational burden and RD performance in Ref.…”

“…Comparison with the state-of-the-art algorithms [26,27,29] It is illustrated as Figs. 11, 12, and 13 that the coding efficiency comparison between the proposed algorithm and the state-of-the-art algorithms in Ref.…”