2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2016.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive learning of human motor behaviors: An evolving inverse optimal control approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the close relationship between the problems of inverse differential games and inverse optimal control, existing methods of inverse differential games and inverse optimal control share the same limitations. For example, the bilevel methods of inverse optimal control of [28] and [29] have computationally expensive implementations that involve the solution of optimal control problems inside numeric optimisation routines. The bilevel and nested optimisation methods of inverse differential games proposed in in [7], [9] and derived from these bilevel methods of inverse optimal control thus also have computationally implementations that scale poorly with the number of players, and state and control dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the close relationship between the problems of inverse differential games and inverse optimal control, existing methods of inverse differential games and inverse optimal control share the same limitations. For example, the bilevel methods of inverse optimal control of [28] and [29] have computationally expensive implementations that involve the solution of optimal control problems inside numeric optimisation routines. The bilevel and nested optimisation methods of inverse differential games proposed in in [7], [9] and derived from these bilevel methods of inverse optimal control thus also have computationally implementations that scale poorly with the number of players, and state and control dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This control strategy is based on a linear approximation of the model such that asymptotically stability in a neighborhood of the operating point is guaranteed if the closed loop system is Hurwitz and the dynamic states are bounded. Optimal control strategies based on the nonlinear model have been proposed for biological processes . The inverse optimal control synthesizes a stabilizing optimal controller based on a nonlinear control Lyapunov function minimizing a cost functional.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal control strategies based on the nonlinear model have been proposed for biological processes. 14,15 The inverse optimal control synthesizes a stabilizing optimal controller based on a nonlinear control Lyapunov function minimizing a cost functional. Then, the proposed approach is extended to disturbed nonlinear systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the optimal control aspect, Ornelas-Tellez, Sanchez, and Loukianov presented an inverse optimal control approach to prevent solving the associated Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation and minimize the cost function in stabilizing discrete-time nonlinear systems [14]. El-Hussieny, Abouelsoud, and Assal used particle swarm optimization to retrieve the unknown cost in their proposed ILQR problem; they proposed an evolving ILQR algorithm in refining the learned cost once new unseen demonstrations exist to overcome the overfitting problem [15]. In the fuzzy control aspect, Boukezzoula et al applied the Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy model and the fuzzy mathematical model to identify the inverse model of nonlinear systems [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%