Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1101/771824
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive landscape flattening allows the design of both enzyme:substrate binding and catalytic power

Abstract: Designed enzymes are of fundamental and technological interest. Experimental directed evolution still has significant limitations, and computational approaches are complementary. A designed enzyme should satisfy multiple criteria: stability, substrate binding, transition state binding. Such multi-objective design is computationally challenging. Two recent studies used adaptive importance sampling Monte Carlo to redesign proteins for ligand binding. By first flattening the energy landscape of the apo protein, t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now, thanks to the new adaptive MC procedure, 41 we can use more relevant quantities. We can directly target the substrate affinity, the catalytic rate, or the catalytic efficiency, which is the ratio of the rate and the Michaelis constant, and closely approximates the second order rate constant.…”
Section: Whole Protein Design Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Now, thanks to the new adaptive MC procedure, 41 we can use more relevant quantities. We can directly target the substrate affinity, the catalytic rate, or the catalytic efficiency, which is the ratio of the rate and the Michaelis constant, and closely approximates the second order rate constant.…”
Section: Whole Protein Design Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which can be interpreted as the free energy to bind and activate the substrate S. 41,54 Specificities are characterized by the free energy difference ∆G eff (S) − ∆G eff (S ), where S and S are the target and reference ligands, respectively. The upper section of Table 5 lists the top sequences obtained with specificity for L-Tyr as the design criterion.…”
Section: Whole Protein Design Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations