2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11760-015-0791-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Kuwahara filter

Abstract: A new filter was created by improving the standard Kuwahara filter. It allows more efficient noise reduction without blurring the edges and image preparation for segmentation and further analyses operations. One of the biggest and most common restrictions encountered in filter algorithms is the need for a declarative definition of the filter window size or the number of iterations that an operation should be repeated. In the case of the proposed solution, we are dealing with automatic adaptation of the algorit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pixel level classifier was trained using a total of 226 training features from TWS. The classifier was trained using a set of TWS training features which included: (i) Noise Reduction: The Kuwahara [37] and Bilateral filters [38] in the TWS toolkit were used to train the classifier on noise removal. These have been reported to be excellent filters for removing noise whilst preserving the edges [38], (ii) Edge Detection: A Sobel filter [39], Hessian matrix [40] and Gabor filter [41] were used for training the classifier on boundary detection in an image, and (iii) Texture filtering: The mean, variance, median, maximum, minimum and entropy filters were used for texture filtering.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pixel level classifier was trained using a total of 226 training features from TWS. The classifier was trained using a set of TWS training features which included: (i) Noise Reduction: The Kuwahara [37] and Bilateral filters [38] in the TWS toolkit were used to train the classifier on noise removal. These have been reported to be excellent filters for removing noise whilst preserving the edges [38], (ii) Edge Detection: A Sobel filter [39], Hessian matrix [40] and Gabor filter [41] were used for training the classifier on boundary detection in an image, and (iii) Texture filtering: The mean, variance, median, maximum, minimum and entropy filters were used for texture filtering.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This stage involves (i) manual extraction of particles from the background (epoxy) with blow/lasso tool embedded in Fiji-ImageJ software, and (ii) elimination of the noise and other artifacts on particle images with the adaptive Kuwahara [20] and Median [21] filters on Fiji-ImageJ. Since x-ray imaging is capable to eliminate noise and other artifacts on the tomographic slices, crosssectional images were not processed before classification.…”
Section: Pre-processing the Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The post-processing stage for the microscopic images included the application of the Kuwahara [20] and Median [21] filters to remove the residual noise and artifacts on the 2D maps. The final 2D map (Figure 8a) after the post-processing of an example image of a polished section (Figure 8b) was provided for a fair assessment of the classification accuracy on microscopic images.…”
Section: Post-processing the 2d Maps Of Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To increase the accuracy of the next classification step, BSE images were preprocessed by removing the noise on them while exposing the boundaries between different objects (mineral surfaces and epoxy). This stage was achieved by successive application of the Kuwahara [36] and sharpen [37] filters to the BSE images. Kuwahara, an edge-preserving filter, was applied on 5 × 5 pixel-window subregions to remove the noise on the BSE images without blurring the boundaries between different image features.…”
Section: Experimental Materials and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%