2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Kalman filters for nonlinear finite element model updating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system noise covariance matrix (Q) is then estimated using the difference between a-posteriori and a-priori states. The optimization is performed in real-time for each time instant [41][42][43]50]. The assumptions for the ASVSF-VBL are as follows,…”
Section: Noise Adaptation For Smooth Variable Structure Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The system noise covariance matrix (Q) is then estimated using the difference between a-posteriori and a-priori states. The optimization is performed in real-time for each time instant [41][42][43]50]. The assumptions for the ASVSF-VBL are as follows,…”
Section: Noise Adaptation For Smooth Variable Structure Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang proposed an adaptive KF for joint polarization tracking [34]. In [42], a comparison between different adaptive strategies for EKF is presented. In [43], sufficient conditions for noise covariance identification of a KF have been introduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling errors are often the most critical and influential source of uncertainty in modeling, model updating and response predictions, especially for civil structures, due to their complexity and large-scale size [ 37 , 52 ]. Different modeling assumptions and simplifications can introduce errors in the numerical models, including, but not limited to, structural linearity assumption, boundary conditions simplification, unmodeled non-structural components, material property uncertainty, discretization, geometry errors, and connection simplification.…”
Section: Uncertainty Quantification and Propagation Through Hierarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods of health state prediction for sensors can be divided into three categories: analytical-based models, data-driven-based intelligent learning models, and qualitative knowledge-based models. In a research object with an accurate math model, the analyticalbased model has been widely used, such as Kalman Filter 3,4 and improved Kalman Filter. 5,6 However, it is difficult to establish a unified mathematical model which can predict the health states of sensors precisely due to the wide variety of sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%