2001
DOI: 10.1300/j074v13n03_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive, Growth-s Oriented, and Positive Perceptions of Mother-Daughter Elder Caregiving Relationships: A Path-Analytic Investigation of Predictors

Abstract: One hundred twenty-two pairs (n = 244) of filial caregivers (daughters) and care recipients (mothers) were interviewed separately, to investigate the factors underlying positive, growth-oriented caregiving relationships. The outcome variable examined was the type of caregiving pair (positive, negative, mixed, and neutral), as determined by "blind" raters. Based on existing research, factors examined as being significant predictors of this outcome variable were perceived roles (role changes, role relations) and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two additional works used mixed methods (Hollis-Sawyer, 2001; Walter, 1991). Both were cross-sectional.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Two additional works used mixed methods (Hollis-Sawyer, 2001; Walter, 1991). Both were cross-sectional.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the quantitative portions, both authors used investigator-devised scales as well as standardized measures that were not replicated in other studies. For the qualitative portions, structured interviews were used to categorize care dyad relationship quality (Hollis-Sawyer, 2001) or support quantitative findings with exemplars (Walter, 1991). Walter (1991) used a sample of 48 mother–daughter dyads and Hollis-Sawyer (2001), 122 dyads.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Studies of responses to receiving care have examined satisfaction with care from a family member (Lucas, Stewart, Archbold, & Harvath, 1986), care receiver satisfaction with life as a whole rather than with caregiving (Dwyer, Lee, & Jankowski, 1994), negotiations between the caregiver and care receiver (Russell, Phillips, Cromwell, & Gregory, 1999), whether members of the care-giving dyad regard the relationship as a positive, adaptive, and growth-oriented experience (Hollis-Sawyer, 2001), care receiver satisfaction with the helping relationship (Martini, Grusec, & Bernardini, 2001), their ratings of the sufficiency of family care (Morrow-Howell, Proctor, & Rozario, 2001), and care receiver perceived quality of spousal care (Martire, Schulz, Wrosch, & Newsom, 2003).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%