Adaptive Governance and Resilience Capacity of Farms: The Fit Between Farmers’ Decisions and Agricultural Policies

Abstract

Greater resilience is needed for farms to deal with shocks and disturbances originating from economic, environmental, social and institutional challenges, with resilience achieved by adequate adaptive governance. This study focuses on the resilience capacity of farms in the context of multi-level adaptive governance. We define adaptive governance as adjustments in decision-making processes at farm level and policy level, through changes in management practices and policies in response to identified challenges and the delivery of desired functions (e.g. private and public goods) to be attained. The aim of the study is twofold. First, we investigate how adaptive governance processes at farm level and policy level influence the resilience capacity of farms in terms of robustness, adaptability and transformability. Second, we investigate the “fit” between the adaptive governance processes at farm level and policy level to enable resilience. We study primary egg and broiler production in Sweden taking into consideration economic, social and environmental challenges. We use semi-structured interviews with 17 farmers to explain the adaptive processes at farm level and an analysis of policy documents from the Common Agricultural Policy program 2014–2020, to explain the intervention actions taken by the Common Agricultural Policy. Results show that neither the farm level nor policy level adaptive processes on their own have the capacity to fully enable farms to be robust, adaptable and transformable. While farm level adaptive processes are mainly directed toward securing the robustness and adaptability of farms, policy level interventions are targeted at enabling adaptability. The farm- and the policy level adaptive processes do not “fit” for attaining robustness and transformability.

Synergistic study of the green efficiency and economic resilience of agriculture from a sustainable development perspective: evidence from Northeast China

“… ① ADIPC. As the agricultural disposable income per capita increases, there is an observable improvement in one’s capacity to manage and withstand economic uncertainties (Manevska-Tasevska et al 2021 ). ② CSI .…”

Agroforestry Implementation as Farmers Resilience Strategies to Support Farming System Sustainability Facing the Land Vulnerability at The Mount Semeru Slopes, Indonesia

“…Farmer resilience can improve to the sustainability of farming systems by promoting adaptability to changing conditions [25], such as climate change, market fluctuations, and pest outbreaks, ensuring that they can continue to farm sustainably and productively. Farmer resilience also contribute to improving resource management, strengthening social fabric, increasing economic stability [26], and enhancing multi-level adaptive governance [27]. This, in turn, can help ensure the long-term viability and sustainability of agricultural systems.…”

Evaluation of Cropland System Resilience to Climate Change at Municipal Scale Through Robustness, Adaptability, and Transformability: A Case Study of Hubei Province, China

“…The interactions and conceptual boundaries are still blurry, which makes indicator selection confusing. Some important indicators have two or three attributes of the three capacities of CSRCC at the same time (Manevska-Tasevska et al, 2021;Nicholas-Davies et al, 2021). In our evaluation index system, for example, the cropland area loss rate is negative to the robustness and adaptability.…”