2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speed and Signal Processing Proceedings
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2006.1660585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive-Gain Tracking Filters Based on Minimization of the Innovation Variance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The state-space equation of such a filter may be interpreted as a MA model and the tracker gain is linearly connected to the MA coefficients [7][8].…”
Section: Problem Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The state-space equation of such a filter may be interpreted as a MA model and the tracker gain is linearly connected to the MA coefficients [7][8].…”
Section: Problem Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown, the steady-gain filter specifies a MA model whose coefficients are linearly tied to the filter gain. This link underlies the adaptive-gain tracker [7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the adaptive filter the steady (or slowly varying) gain k is adjusted due to the prediction error, e n . In the direct parameterization form of the steady KF [10] all unknowns are cast in k. For the parameter estimation we use the input-output equation [8,9] …”
Section: Adaptive Gain Tracking Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7], either rely on the universal methods of AKF or use various forms of the user experience like the expert rules, fuzzy reasoning, etc. The remaining niche can be filled in with a simple and equally fully automatic adaptive gain tracker [8,9]. The attractiveness of this filter is in that the α-β gain is adjusted in a manner similar to the usual recursive estimation of the autoregressive moving-average (ARMA) model, based upon the classical parameter identification technique [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%