2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-017-3513-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive fuzzy visual tracking control for manipulator with quantized saturation input

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on [5, 6] used a subtle controller to remove the strict assumptions that the non‐linear functions satisfy the global Lipschitz condition. By introducing a saturation switch quantiser, an adaptive fuzzy visual tracking control problem for the quantised system was solved in [7]. To remove the problem that the real control signal is hidden in the coupling dynamics, a new non‐linear decomposition of quantiser was proposed in [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on [5, 6] used a subtle controller to remove the strict assumptions that the non‐linear functions satisfy the global Lipschitz condition. By introducing a saturation switch quantiser, an adaptive fuzzy visual tracking control problem for the quantised system was solved in [7]. To remove the problem that the real control signal is hidden in the coupling dynamics, a new non‐linear decomposition of quantiser was proposed in [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantisation can save communication bandwidth, but also bring stronger non-linearity to the system. Therefore, some adaptive quantised control results have been presented in [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. An adaptive backstepping stabilisation scheme was proposed for a non-linear uncertain system with a quantised input signal in [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on a subtle controller design, Yu and Yan removed several strict assumptions of the system in the work of Zhou et al An adaptive tracking scheme was studied for uncertain nonlinear systems with quantized input and unknown parameters in the work of Choi and Yoo . Adaptive fuzzy visual control was developed for manipulator with quantized saturation input in the work of Wang et al On the other hand, the logarithmic quantizer presented in the work of Elia and Mitter was proved to be the most efficient for Lyapunov stabilization. To prevent the chattering appearing while the states or the control law varied around the boundary point of quantization, the hysteresis logarithmic quantizer was designed in the works of De Persis and Mazenc( and Ceragioli et al This quantizer was widely applied to adaptive quantized control in related works.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along the line of quantized control input, some novel results are given in literature. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] By utilizing uniform quantizer, 22 the control signals are divided into equivalent and average quantization blocks, yet, this kind of quantizer is generally not applicable to the asymptotically tracking control since only fixed quantization level is available even if exact quantization precision is required. To overcome this issue, logarithmic quantizers are adopted in the works by Fu and Xie 23 and Xing et al, 24 and the adaptive control schemes are based upon the sector-bounded property of quantization errors to design appropriate control laws.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this issue, logarithmic quantizers are adopted in the works by Fu and Xie 23 and Xing et al, 24 and the adaptive control schemes are based upon the sector-bounded property of quantization errors to design appropriate control laws. In previous literature, [25][26][27][28] hysteretic quantizer, which can be regarded as a combination of two logarithmic quantizers with identical gain but opposite direction, is used to avoid chattering phenomenon. However, the above results assume that the structural property and exact parametric knowledge of the adopted quantizer are known in the controller design, which seems unpractical since the model parameters are user-defined and adjusted to obtain optimal control performances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%