2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2009.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive fractional Fourier domain filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This performance of LEF signals is different from those presented with chirp and LFM signals where the adaptation of algorithm is presented at the initial stage of the FRFT signal and the fast adaptation of the filter reduces gradually the error [29].…”
Section: Performance Analysis and Complexity Of Adaptive Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This performance of LEF signals is different from those presented with chirp and LFM signals where the adaptation of algorithm is presented at the initial stage of the FRFT signal and the fast adaptation of the filter reduces gradually the error [29].…”
Section: Performance Analysis and Complexity Of Adaptive Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…[28][29][30] show that these algorithms present good results with LFM signals because FRFT converts this type of signals into stationary sinusoidal signals at the appropriate transformation order. However, with transient signals (as lightning electromagnetic fields), the FRFT converts a LEF signal into a narrow band signal with a symmetric center u 0 .…”
Section: Fractional Order Estimation For Lef Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is hard to obtain a satisfactory analysis for this kind of multi-component signal using existing methods. The fractional Fourier transform [14][15][16] can be used to analyze multi-component LFM signals only, and the estimated frequency obtained by using the energy operator [17] has large error margins. A possible alternative is time-frequency analysis [11][12][13], but the cross terms in the time-frequency distribution would greatly impact the effect, as is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Simulation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19, we give the estimation precision (NRMSE curves) of all the parameters under different sampling frequencies (F s = k × Fn, k = 1 · · · 8, Fn = 38.4 MHz, 2Fn = 76.8 MHz is the sampling frequency of the signals corresponding to Figs. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and SNRs, and we see that the NRMSE is lower when the sampling frequency is higher.…”
Section: Simulation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the optimum multiplicative filter function that minimizes the mean square error in the αth fractional Fourier domain was derived in [80]. Similarly, a novel fractional adaptive filtering scheme was introduced [81], and simulation results showed that adaptive filtering in the fractional domain is superior in comparison to its time domain counterparts.…”
Section: A Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%