2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2017.08.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive finite-time tracking control of switched nonlinear systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, inequality is restated as V˙ia()tλ2Vib()tηλ2Via()t+normalε=ληξ2Via()t()1ξλη2Via()t+normalε, where 0 < ξ < 1 is a constant. Defining ΩX={}|XVia()tnormalεfalse/()()1ξλη2 and referring to the work of Wang et al, it can be proved that the states X ( t ) of each subsystem will converge to the set Ω X in the finite time Ti2ληξ()Via()trϵ0.5()1ξλη+tr and they will not go over this set. This implies that the state trajectories X ( t ) of each subsystem will be finite‐time stable in the sense of Definition and based on , they will converge to zero after they reach the set Ω X .…”
Section: Design Of the Proposed Control Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Accordingly, inequality is restated as V˙ia()tλ2Vib()tηλ2Via()t+normalε=ληξ2Via()t()1ξλη2Via()t+normalε, where 0 < ξ < 1 is a constant. Defining ΩX={}|XVia()tnormalεfalse/()()1ξλη2 and referring to the work of Wang et al, it can be proved that the states X ( t ) of each subsystem will converge to the set Ω X in the finite time Ti2ληξ()Via()trϵ0.5()1ξλη+tr and they will not go over this set. This implies that the state trajectories X ( t ) of each subsystem will be finite‐time stable in the sense of Definition and based on , they will converge to zero after they reach the set Ω X .…”
Section: Design Of the Proposed Control Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we will have K2Vd()tνK2Vc()t+normalϵ. Accordingly, inequality is restated as V˙ia()tK2Vc()tνK2Vc()t+normalϵ=Kνξ2Vc()t()1ξλν2Vc()t+normalϵ, where 0 < ξ < 1 is a constant. Defining ζ={}S,trueω^ω and Ωζ={}|ζVia()tnormalϵfalse/()()1ξKν2, on the basis of the work of Wang et al, it can be proved that the variables ζ ( t ) will approach to the set Ω ζ in the finite time Tr2italicKνξ()Vc()t0normalϵ0.5()1ξKν+t0 and they will not exceed this set. This implies that the state trajectories X ( t ) of the system will reach the sliding manifold in practical finite‐time sense of Definition , and based on , they will converge to S ( t ) = 0 once they...…”
Section: Design Of the Proposed Control Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finite-time control has received much attention because it can provide many benefits such as strong robustness and better disturbance resistance capability [3,4,61]. The Lyapunov theory of finite-time stability for nonlinear systems has been clearly established by several authors [62,63].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%