The Optimum Shape 1986
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-9483-3_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Finite Element Methods for Shape Optimization of Linearly Elastic Structures

Abstract: Grid adaptive methods combined with means for automatic remeshing are applied to problems in shape optimal design of linearly elastic structures. The quantitative effect of element distortion near the design boundaries is identified in terms of interpolation error associated with the finite element discretization. The grid adaptation is itself formulated as a structural optimization problem, with an objective function that reflects the discretization error. A 'necessary condition' from this formulation provide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These experiments were conducted on a 3.00 GHz Intel(R) Xeon(R) X5365 processor and 32.0 GB of RAM. We performed structural analysis using VOX-ELCON 2010 [4], which is based on image-based CAE [22][23] and one of voxel analysis. The input numbers and calculation results for all examples are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These experiments were conducted on a 3.00 GHz Intel(R) Xeon(R) X5365 processor and 32.0 GB of RAM. We performed structural analysis using VOX-ELCON 2010 [4], which is based on image-based CAE [22][23] and one of voxel analysis. The input numbers and calculation results for all examples are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it has been rigorously proven for a certain subset of scenarios by Wheeler (1976). Kikuchi et al (1986) presented a proof of the theorem for unconstrained design variables, i.e. for problems where the design boundary d is not constrained by the variation domainˆ .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Treating the finite element node coordinates directly as design variables, i.e. using the identity map x ¼xðdÞ ¼ d, is among the earliest options for finite element-based shape optimization [78,43]. The main advantages of this independent node movement approach are: (1) it allows the most freedom for shape change; and (2) it does not require the time-consuming shape parameterization process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%