1997
DOI: 10.1109/36.628782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive estimation of noise covariance matrices in real-time preprocessing of geophysical data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the early 1970s, Mehra [5] classified into four categories the methods for the estimation of the KF covariances: Bayesian [6], [7], ML [8]- [10], correlation [11]- [20], and covariance matching [2], [3].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early 1970s, Mehra [5] classified into four categories the methods for the estimation of the KF covariances: Bayesian [6], [7], ML [8]- [10], correlation [11]- [20], and covariance matching [2], [3].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This convex program can be solved efficiently with Newton's method and the gradient can be determined analytically [1]. This approach is a significant simplification of the strategy to maintain positive semi-definiteness proposed by [17]. None of the earlier approaches have been tested on closed-loop data coming from controllers containing integrated white noise disturbance models.…”
Section: Comments On Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loebis et al (Loebis et al, 2004) proposed an adaptive EKF algorithm, which adjusted the measurement noise covariance matrix by fuzzy logic. Other works can also be seen in references (Noriega & Pasupathy, 1997;Mehra, 1970;Hu et al, 2003;Chaer et al, 1997;Garcia-Velo, 1997). As far as the adaptive UKF (AUKF) is concerned, the most-oftenmentioned scheme was proposed by Lee and Alfriend (Lee & Alfriend, 2004), where the Maybeck's method (Maybeck, 1979) was modified by maximum-likelihood principle to estimate the error covariance matrix, and this estimator was further integrated into the normal UKF as the adaptive mechanism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%