The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1002/asjc.2433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive dynamic surface control of a class of pure feedback systems preceded by generalized P‐I hysteresis

Abstract: In this paper, an adaptive dynamic surface control is proposed for a class of completely non-affine nonlinear systems preceded by the generalized Prandtl-Ishlinskii (P-I) hysteresis, in which the hysteresis input function is also non-affine with respect to the control input. Instead of the mean value theorem widely used in existing literature, new nonlinear functions are

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different from the traditional backstepping method, the derivative term in the backstepping method was replaced via the output of a first-order filter in the control signal. Likewise, the filtering error is introduced into the Lyapunov function [16]. On the premise of Lyapunov stability and smooth projection operator, a new neural network adaptive finite time DSC algorithm was proposed [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from the traditional backstepping method, the derivative term in the backstepping method was replaced via the output of a first-order filter in the control signal. Likewise, the filtering error is introduced into the Lyapunov function [16]. On the premise of Lyapunov stability and smooth projection operator, a new neural network adaptive finite time DSC algorithm was proposed [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, there exists an error in the measurement of the angle of rotation in the open-loop drive axis control of MEMS gyroscopes if any single system parameter is changed. Similarly, closed-loop driving control techniques, for example, phase-locked loop control, force balancing feedback control [6], automatic gain control [7], dynamic surface control (DSC) [8], adaptive control [9][10], and Lyapunov control [11] increased the throughput and range of the MEMS gyroscope than open-loop control, still, these are affected by the parameter variations and quadrature error which affects the angular rate. Most of the already proposed control schemes only present mathematical models and do not consider uncertainties as in [6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, sensitivity of the gyroscope is degraded due to the different factors like imperfections in the fabrication process, environmental changes which result in a change of parameters, the mechanical coupling of both axes, and several types of noises alongside axes. So, to boost the performance of the MEMS gyroscope multi-agent systems and control the drive axis oscillations, both closed-loop, and open-loop controllers can be used [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Still, there exists an error in the measurement of the angle of rotation in the open-loop drive axis control of MEMS gyroscopes if any single system parameter is changed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%