2021
DOI: 10.1002/acs.3232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive cross backstepping control for a class of nonstrict feedback nonlinear systems with partial state constraints

Abstract: The tracking control problem for a class of partial state constrained nonlinear system is studied in this article. The system is divided into two semistrict feedback nonlinear subsystems, one is state constrained and the other is state free. By means of state transformation, the state constraint problem is transformed into the bounded problem of the transformed function. Compared with the barrier Lyapunov function (BLF) method, it not only solves the state constraint problem but also circumvents the feasibilit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, a time‐variant BLF‐based controller is proposed for an upper limb exoskeleton, 16 the tracking error was kept in a decreasing boundary by BLF to make the subject's motion trajectory more closely match the desired trajectory. And the BLF is also widely used to deal with state constraints 17 and output constraints 18 . A symmetric integral BLF‐based controller is proposed for manipulators, 19 in which the full‐state constraint on the manipulators is achieved by setting preset boundaries on position and velocity by BLF, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, a time‐variant BLF‐based controller is proposed for an upper limb exoskeleton, 16 the tracking error was kept in a decreasing boundary by BLF to make the subject's motion trajectory more closely match the desired trajectory. And the BLF is also widely used to deal with state constraints 17 and output constraints 18 . A symmetric integral BLF‐based controller is proposed for manipulators, 19 in which the full‐state constraint on the manipulators is achieved by setting preset boundaries on position and velocity by BLF, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the BLF-based constrained control method, NM-based counterpart can directly deal with the original state/output constraints, and thus, the undesirable feasibility conditions in [3] can be removed. Based on these two methods, fruitful results were obtained; see [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and other papers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, in this paper, the proposed controller is able to reject the uncertainties, which fulfills the more general conditions, that is, the upper bound of the uncertainty in ith,i=1,,2n,false(nthfalse)$i{\rm{th}},\ i\ = \ 1, \ldots ,2n,( {nth} )$ channel is made up of not only the states x1,,xi${x}_1, \ldots ,{x}_i$, but also xi+1(u)${x}_{i + 1}( u )$, which is viewed as the virtual control input. Therefore, our contribution is to extend the controllers with cross backstepping approach, presented in [26], in order to reject a more general class of uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [26] the tracking control problem for a class of partial state constrained cross‐strict feedback non‐linear system is studied. In spite of the fact that it is compared with the current studies, matched and mismatched uncertainties are regarded in [26], but the key assumption on the uncertain terms (i.e. Di${D}_i$, i=1,,2n$i\ = \ 1, \ldots ,2n$) is that they are bounded by known and positive functions of states x1,,xi${x}_1, \ldots ,{x}_i$ (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%