The COVID-19 outbreak has forced most countries to impose new contact-limiting restrictions at workplaces, universities, schools, and more roadly in our societies. Yet, the power and imitations of these unprecedented strategies or containing virus spread within the populations remain unquantified. Here, we develop a simulation study to analyze COVID-19 outbreak magnitudes on three real-life contact networks stemming from a workplace, a primary school and a high school in France.
Our study provides the first fine-grained analysis of the impact of contact-limiting strategies at work-places, schools and high schools, including (1) Rotating, in which workers are evenly split into two shifts that alternate on a daily or weekly basis; and (2) On-Off, where the whole group alternates periods of normal work interactions with complete telecommuting. We model epidemics spread in these different setups using an SEIR transmission model enriched with the coronavirus most salient specificities: super-spreaders, infec-tious asymptomatic individuals, and pre-symptomatic infectious periods. Our study yields clear results: The ranking of the strategies based on their ability to mitigate epidemic propagation in the network from a first index case is the same for all network topologies (work place, primary school and high school). Namely, from best to worst: Rotating week-by-week, Rotating day-by-day, On-Off week-by-week, and On-Off day-by-day. Moreover, our results show that when the baseline reproduction number R0 within the network is < 1:38, all four strategies efficiently control outbreak by decreasing effective Re to <1. These results can support public health decisions and telecommuting organization locally.