2006 IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Sysetems 2006
DOI: 10.1109/mobhoc.2006.278610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Consensus Averaging for Information Fusion over Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the applications of the consensus problem include: sensor and information fusion (Talebi et al 2006;Xiao et al 2005), coordination of groups of robots (OlfatiSaber 2006;Tanner et al 2003aTanner et al , 2003bJadbabaie et al 2003) and coordinated decision making (Bauso et al 2003;Alanyali et al 2004). A review of consensus problem on cooperation of robots is presented by Ren et al (2007).…”
Section: Consensus Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the applications of the consensus problem include: sensor and information fusion (Talebi et al 2006;Xiao et al 2005), coordination of groups of robots (OlfatiSaber 2006;Tanner et al 2003aTanner et al , 2003bJadbabaie et al 2003) and coordinated decision making (Bauso et al 2003;Alanyali et al 2004). A review of consensus problem on cooperation of robots is presented by Ren et al (2007).…”
Section: Consensus Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [15,16,17], the authors compute the average of the sensor measurements combined with local Kalman filtering and/or mobile agents. The works developed in [14,18,19] consist of distributed linear iterations, where each sensor updates its current state by a weighted fusion of its current neighbors' states (which are distorted when they reach it) and these fusion weights decrease to zero in an appropriate way, as time progresses. Other authors consider some practical issues in sensor networks such as fault tolerance and asynchronism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors consider some practical issues in sensor networks such as fault tolerance and asynchronism. For instance, some works compute the average while taking into account link failures [20], other works study the consensus problem into asynchronous environment [21,22] while considering communication delays, or from the energy point of view by minimizing the number of iterations [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some approaches like [15], [13], [14] compute the average of the sensor measurements combined with local Kalman filtering and/or mobile agents. Other works consist of distributed linear iterations, where each sensor updates its current state by a weighted fusion of its current neighbors' states (which are distorted when they reach it) and these fusion weights decrease to zero in an appropriate way, as time progresses [12], [20], [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, some works compute the average while taking into account link failures [11], other works study the consensus problem into asynchronous environment [2], [4] while considering communication delays, or from the energy point of view by minimizing the number of iterations [18]. To the best of our knowledge, none of these approaches is able to successfully integrate all sensor networks constraints in their studies especially the fact of node failures [16], [8], [17], [21], [5] and the design of an interesting analytical bound of the actual number of moves/iterations required by the algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%