Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.100.012346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive compressive tomography: A numerical study

Abstract: We perform several numerical studies for our recently published adaptive compressive tomography scheme [D. Ahn et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 100404 (2019)], which significantly reduces the number of measurement settings to unambiguously reconstruct any rank-deficient state without any a priori knowledge besides its dimension. We show that both entangled and product bases chosen by our adaptive scheme perform comparably well with recently-known compressed-sensing element-probing measurements, and also beat rando… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirdly, provable CS-QST measurements with known tight scaling for r d are restricted to highly specific measurements, two examples include the random Pauli-observable expectation 21 and element-probing measurements. 23 Since 2019, we reported several works [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] that investigate the problem of compressive tomography in different perspectives that are completely independent from CS. Essentially, we developed a self-consistent informational completeness certification (ICC) routine that can decisively state whether a given set of measurements and data is informationally complete (IC); that is, whether a unique reconstruction of the unknown quantum object is possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, provable CS-QST measurements with known tight scaling for r d are restricted to highly specific measurements, two examples include the random Pauli-observable expectation 21 and element-probing measurements. 23 Since 2019, we reported several works [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] that investigate the problem of compressive tomography in different perspectives that are completely independent from CS. Essentially, we developed a self-consistent informational completeness certification (ICC) routine that can decisively state whether a given set of measurements and data is informationally complete (IC); that is, whether a unique reconstruction of the unknown quantum object is possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard ancilla-free framework shall be considered here, which consists of input states (ρ IN ) and outputstate von Neumann basis measurements that can be feasibly implemented in practice. Our scheme comprises an adaptive compressive (state) tomography (ACT) protocol [40,41] that reconstructs the unknown output states (ρ OUT = Φ[ρ IN ]) from adaptively chosen bases, and an informational completeness certification that determines whether the process estimator ρ Φ (distinguished with a hat from the true process operator ρ Φ ) is uniquely characterized by the accumulated dataset or not. This can be achieved with semidefinite programs [42,43].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The first component is the ACT scheme [40,41] that chooses a compressive sequence of optimal von Neumann measurements to efficiently characterize every output state. In every step, it first certifies if the accumulated data uniquely characterize, say, ρ OUT after feeding ρ IN to Φ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is the adaptive measurement stage responsible for generating U. Since our χ of interest is rank deficient, we can turn ACQPT into a compressive scheme by employing an effective low-rank guiding prescription: After ICC, an estimator with the minimum von Neumann entropy (minENT) is chosen from C [46][47][48][49]. The next optimal U for the χ rotation would be the one that diagonalizes this estimator to be the eigenvalues in descending order.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%