2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/ner.2013.6695959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Common Spatial Pattern for single-trial EEG classification in multisubject BCI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance (Sun 2006) and (Shenoy 2006) proposed to re-optimize the CSP filters as a new batch of labelled data becomes available. Later, (Zhao 2008), and (Song 2013) proposed new algorithms to incrementally update the CSP spatial filters without the need to reoptimize everything. (Tomioka 2006) proposed a method to adapt spatial filters to changing EEG data class distribution.…”
Section: Adaptive Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance (Sun 2006) and (Shenoy 2006) proposed to re-optimize the CSP filters as a new batch of labelled data becomes available. Later, (Zhao 2008), and (Song 2013) proposed new algorithms to incrementally update the CSP spatial filters without the need to reoptimize everything. (Tomioka 2006) proposed a method to adapt spatial filters to changing EEG data class distribution.…”
Section: Adaptive Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classifiers are trained offline on the sampled activity, yielding a model that maps the underlying features to a set of outputs (e.g., left vs. right imagined movement), and are then employed online to map the recorded activity to an output in real time ( Iturrate et al, 2020 ). Common machine learning algorithms used in BCI applications for decoding a subject’s imagined movement include neural networks ( Pfurtscheller and Neuper, 2001 ; Hazrati and Erfanian, 2010 ), linear discriminant analysis ( Pfurtscheller and Neuper, 2001 ; Vidaurre et al, 2011 ; Llera et al, 2014 ), and support vector machines ( Song et al, 2013 ), while during the last few years the field has experienced a steady shift of interest toward more elaborate deep learning architectures ( Roy et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Current Approaches To Non-invasive Motor Imagery Based Brain-computer Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process was repeated for successive blocks of testing data, hence generally adaptively improving the quality of the CSP and classifiers as more testing data are encountered. Along the same line of ideas, [52] also adapted the CSP spatial filters in a unsupervised way. To do so, they measured three types of differences/similarities between the (unlabeled) test trials and the training trials in order to adapt the estimated covariance matrices from each class with the test trials; with a stronger adaptation for the class for which the test trials were more similar.…”
Section: Semi-supervised Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data sets used, the methods studied and the evaluation results are described in the following sections. Multi-users covariance matrix estimation [35], [36], [33] X Multi-task learning [38], [39], [40], [41] Domain adaptation [43], [44], [45], [42] Semi-supervised learning [49], [50], [51], [52] X A priori physiological information [53], [54], […”
Section: Evaluations and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%