Proceedings of ICC'97 - International Conference on Communications
DOI: 10.1109/icc.1997.595036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive coded modulation for fading channels

Abstract: Abstract-We apply coset codes to adaptive modulation in fading channels. Adaptive modulation is a powerful technique to improve the energy efficiency and increase the data rate over a fading channel. Coset codes are a natural choice to use with adaptive modulation since the channel coding and modulation designs are separable. Therefore, trellis and lattice codes designed for additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channels can be superimposed on adaptive modulation for fading channels, with the same approximate c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another approach to multiplexing URLLC and eMBB traffic is Trellis-and Network-coded modulation (TC-NCM) [17]. Based the Ungerboeck's scheme [18] and the general type of coset coding advocated by Goldsmith in [19] and Chapter 8 of [20], the authors propose adaptive TC-NCM structure, where the transmitter adapts the coding rate and modulation mode according to the channel estimates fed back via feedback channels. The main disadvantage of this method is the lack of encoding of the URLLC stream, which negatively affects the reliability and transmission rate of URLLC messages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach to multiplexing URLLC and eMBB traffic is Trellis-and Network-coded modulation (TC-NCM) [17]. Based the Ungerboeck's scheme [18] and the general type of coset coding advocated by Goldsmith in [19] and Chapter 8 of [20], the authors propose adaptive TC-NCM structure, where the transmitter adapts the coding rate and modulation mode according to the channel estimates fed back via feedback channels. The main disadvantage of this method is the lack of encoding of the URLLC stream, which negatively affects the reliability and transmission rate of URLLC messages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%